“only marginally significant”

In addition, while the Group × Block interaction was only marginally significant ( F (3,63) = 2.17, p = 0.10), both the increase in N400 from Block 1 to Block 2 and the decrease from Block 2 to Block 3 were significant for MUS (Block 1: −2.79 μV, SD = 1.66; Block 2: −5.46 μV, SD = 2.10; Block 3: −2.23 μV, SD = 2.04; Tukey, 1 vs. 2: p = 0.02, and 2 vs. 3: p = 0.005; main effect of Block: F (3,33) = 5.34, p = 0.004) but not for NM (main effect of Block: F (3,30) = 1.13, p = 0.35; see Figures 4A,B for topographic distributions of effects).

Another nine (7%) analyses were only marginally significant (i.e., p < .10) in the expected direction.

We found the path to be only marginally significant (standardized weight: −.046, t = −1.8, p < .1).

However, the strength of this association was reduced and only marginally significant ( p < 0.10) when preference for the equity principle, gender, and academic unit were added to the equation.

In terms of exposure to at least two deaths, the coefficient is large in the transition to adulthood model, but only marginally significant (Model 7, Relative Risk [RR]: 3.818, p < 0.10).

The estimate for Openness was only marginally significant ( p < .10).

Non-Hispanic Black students were much more likely than White students to report college food insecurity, though this difference was only marginally significant (AOR = 3.44, 95% CI = [0.90, 13.16], p < 0.1).

Although the association between high risk of sleep apnea and diagnosed diabetes was positive, this association was only marginally significant ( p < 0.1) when adjusting for age and gender alone.

This relationship remained only marginally significant when BMI ( p < 0.10), sum of skinfolds ( p < 0.09) or percentage of fat ( p < 0.08) were controlled.

Although the effect on cyber-offending appears to be much stronger, the difference in effects is only marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 2.83; p < .10).

However, here too, sphericity was violated and the more conservative corrections returned only marginally significant results ( P < 0.1, Table 2 ).

For Td , the only periopathogen that exhibited an increase throughout the observation period, the differences were only marginally significant (P<0.1) ( Table IV ).

Regarding the direct effect of environmental noise on sleep, only marginally significant effects were observed (0.05 < p < 0.1), and no clear trend was identified ( Table 4 ).

The effect among the extreme right is, however, only marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Indices formulated using green and red bands, GR, NDVIg and OSAVIg showed significant correlation ( P < 0.01) with CCI at anthesis and final grain filling, whereas the correlation between the indices GR and NDVIg with CCI at the initial grain filling stage was only marginally significant (r = 0.56, P < 0.10).

While spending on these branded drugs decreased significantly by 1.27 % (95 % CI, 0.53 %-2.01 %, p < 0.001), increased spending on generics was only marginally significant (0.60 %; 95 % CI, −0.12 %-1.31 %, p = 0.10).

In terms of moral order and learned competencies, highly religious women were slightly more willing to refuse unwanted sex than women with average religiosity, although this difference was only marginally significant ( p <.10).

Heterozygosity excess was significant (p<0.05) for the Wilcoxon test in all cases, except for the Western Cantabrian subpopulation without migrants, for which it was only marginally significant (p<0.1).

Similarly, a significant interaction was found for healthcare decisions: 3-5-month-olds were less likely to be wasted if they lived in households that were both economically better-off and mothers had more input into healthcare decisions, though the interaction was only marginally significant (β healthcare = 0.330, ns; β economic = -0.060, ns; β interaction = −0.330 p < 0.10).

Groups with DM tended to have a longer latency, smaller amplitude, and a lower CV compared to groups without DM, but these differences were only marginally significant ( p <0.1).

(OR = 6.17, P<0.05) In addition, the odds of misclassification increased by 1.04 times for each one-year increase in mothers’ age, but this was only marginally significant (p<0.10).

However, this difference was only marginally significant ( p < 0.1, using Student’s t -test). 2.4.

At the attended position ERP differences between threatening and fearful stimuli reached the significance level ( t (12) = 8.47, p < .01) while the difference between happy and threatening voices was only marginally significant (happy vs. threatening: t (12) = 3.12, p < .1).

Yet the effect for ghost authors is not significant at the conventional p < 0.05 level but only marginally significant at p < 0.1.

The difference between White men and Asian women is only marginally significant (OR = 2.61, p < .10).