Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.0581.2× alpha
Attempts to solve the task The factor species showed a trend towards affecting the frequency of attempts to solve the task (i.e. getting the food) (GLMM, LRT: χ 2 (1) = 3.35, p = 0.058), with dogs tending to attempt more often than pigs ( Z = −1.891, p = 0.058; figure 4a ; see electronic supplementary material, table S9 for complete model results).
showed a trendp = 0.0581.2× alpha
Using the UK dataset, reduced survival was significantly associated with a higher Ann Arbor disease stage (hazard ratio (HR) at treatment initiation 2.59 per stage increase by 1, 95% CI 1.45–4.66, p = 0.001) and showed a trend towards association with age (HR 1.02 per year of age, CI 1.00–1.04, p = 0.058) and RDI ≤ 90% (HR 1.42, CI 0.88–2.28, p = 0.146).
showed a trendp = .0581.2× alpha
Results Unlike the controls, the SAD group showed a trend toward significant correlations between baseline RMSSD and left anterior insula activity during neutral face processing ( R 2 = 0.118, β = -0.003, F= 3.886 , p = .058) and significant correlations with both left anterior insula and right amygdala activities during angry face processing ( R 2 = 0.157, β = -0.003, F = 5.415, p = .027 and R 2 = 0.135, β = -0.002, F = 4.360, p = .046, respectively).
In this study, patients who received radiotherapy during systemic treatment showed a trend toward improved iPFS compared with those who underwent radiotherapy prior to starting this regimen (P = 0.058), although this did not reach statistical significance due to the retrospective design and limited sample size( supplement Figure2 ).
Analysis of accuracy revealed marginally significant effects for target presence [present: .91 ± .01, absent: .93 ± .01; F (1, 26) = 3.93, p = .058, ŋ 2 p = .13] and for the interaction between condition and target presence, F (1, 26) = 3.89, p = .059, ŋ 2 p = .13, which showed a trend for higher accuracy for safe versus avoidance conditions in target absent trials.
showed a trendp = 0.0581.2× alpha
For A05, the language-domain specific network showed a trend to predict language performance (p = 0.058), the executive function domain specifically predicted executive function, but the memory-domain network did not reach significance for the memory network when controlled for the other domains ( Supplementary Figure S2 ), probably due to the fact that performance on the memory test and language tests are not entirely independent from each other. 3.2.