Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

30 In the present analysis, a consistent pharmacodynamic effect was observed in patients with RMS, where an incomplete B-cell depletion or higher B-cell counts in blood before the next infusion showed a trend toward elevated risk of disease progression over the DBP and OLE, and higher median B-cell levels during the 96-week DBP showed a trend for more disability progression in the OLE.
However, when FS-R and FS-V animals were segregated 24 h after stress as above, we observed that FS-V rats showed a trend for reduced sucrose intake compared to both CNT and FS-R animals already 6 h after stress while the reduction was significant 24 h and 72 h after FS (significant effect of time F(4,81) = 6.762 and stress F(2,22) = 10.54; Tukey’s test: 6 h: FS-V vs CNT p = 0.0592, FS-V vs FS-R p = 0.0727; 24 h: FS-V vs CNT p < 0.01, FS-V vs FS-R p < 0.01; 72 h: FS-V vs CNT p < 0.05, FS-V vs FS-R p < 0.05) (Fig. 2C ).
8a, b , after the local administrations of the primary tumor twice, it can be clearly observed that the distal tumors of the control (PBS group) mice progressed rapidly, and the distal tumors of the mice in the TLND group also showed a trend of proliferation and growth, while the distal tumors of the mice treated with Ang-PAMSe/TLND nanomotors almost completely disappeared, implying that Ang-PAMSe/TLND nanomotors had a good effect of inhibiting and clearing the distal tumors.
Cumulative incidence of CVD in the various groups During a follow-up period of 5.04 ± 2.80 years, the cumulative incidences of CVD in the groups with High non-HDL-C and normal baPWV, Normal non-HDL-C and high baPWV, and High both non-HDL-C and baPWV showed a trend to increase vs. the group with normal non-HDL-C and normal baPWV (cumulative incidences of CVD for each group: 1.09, 2.96, 7.29, and 10.01; incidence densities for each group: 2.11/1,000, 3.59/1,000, 4.44/1,000, and 6.06/1,000 person-years; respectively); and the differences in the cumulative incidences of the endpoint events among the groups were statistically significant (log-rank test; all P < 0.05); as shown in Figure 2 . 3.3.
showed a trend to increase QTc interval, while Minotti et al. reported a trend to decrease QTc interval in the ranolazine group compared to the control group. 21 , 27 , 30 However, we found there was no statistical difference (I 2 :86%, p=0.27) between ranolazine and the control group regarding QTc interval.