Barely Significant
← all phrases

tendency towards significance

71 sentences · 71 papers · 409 search hits before verification

In the literature

tendency towards significancep = 0.0551.1× alpha
A tendency towards significance was observed also in digit span forward (U = 130; p = 0.055; d = 0.31) and in the number of errors in the Stroop test (U = 137; p = 0.053; d = 0.27), with the non-COVID-19 group performing better than the ICU patients.
tendency towards significancep = 0.0561.1× alpha
The effects of the mindfulness training remained significant for proenvironmental choices (Group × Session: β = − 0.68, z = 2.38, p = 0.017), proenvironmental decision times (Group × Session × Choice: β = 0.08, t (68) = 2.51, p = 0.01), and showed a tendency towards significance for prosocial decision times (Group × Session × Choice: β = 0.05, t (64) = 1.95, p = 0.056), mirroring the main results.
tendency towards significancep = 0.0561.1× alpha
The pairwise comparison tests showed a tendency towards significance between the first three items and the middle items (Durbin-Conover statistic = 1.93, p = 0.056) and a significant difference between the middle and last items and a significant difference between the middle and the last items (Durbin-Conover statistic = 2.98, p = 0.003).
tendency towards significancep = 0.05831.2× alpha
Similarly, in Model 4, adjusted for age, BMI, parity, menopausal status, smoking status, tumor stage, tumor diameter, intrinsic type, histological type, and nodal involvement, the outcome demonstrated a tendency towards significance, with a higher risk of breast cancer relapse associated with a lower post-treatment sP-selectin concentration (Beta = −0.2437, p = 0.0583). 3.10.
tendency towards significancep = 0.0781.6× alpha
When looking at each valence separately, we found a significant effect of Trust on perceived social intent in positive sentences ( β = 0.25, SE = 0.10, t (2.53), 95% CI = 0.05–0.46, p = 0.015, R adj 2 = 0.788; note that the random effects in this analysis did not explain any of the variance, so we conducted a linear regression instead), and a tendency towards significance in the effect of trust in the negative valence ( β = 0.18, SE = 0.10, t (1.76), 95% CI = -0.02–0.38, p = 0.078, ICC = 0.05, R marginal 2 = 0.057, R conditional 2 = 0.104).
The feeding behavior, milk yields and milk parameters had a p value of the models for the groups that were not always significant ( p > 0.05) during the adaptation period, whereas it was possible to observe a tendency towards significance with regards to body weight ( p = 0.08).