“very close to significance”

There was also a difference between standard deviations that trended very close to significance (male faces, M = 2.324; 95% CI = [2.212, 2.448]; female faces, M = 2.484; 95% CI = [2.339, 2.646], p = 0.0508).

However, the univariate analysis showed an effect very close to significance in the case of e-victimization (EVPA1), F (1, 110) = 1.87, p = .051, η 2 = .03 (see Table 3 ).

However, SE3 (“I put the same amount of effort into the inspection as if I had worked on it alone.”) was very close to significance, H(2) = 2.67, p = 0.051.

Statistical analysis indicates that the reduction in bilateral posterior discharges between the group of 3 to ≤6 years and that of 6 to ≤10 is very close to significance ( p = 0.051, binomial statistics) and the comparison between cases of 3 to ≤6 years and the group with the oldest cases is statistically significant ( p = 0.028, binomial statistics).

In the case of EP risk, the interaction term was very close to significance ( P = .051, Table 4 ).

It is interesting, however, that the right thigh showed no similar significant change in dimple volume throughout the study (n = 14, p = 0.6890) - see Figure 7 . When the data for both thighs are combined, they also show no significance with Tukey’s multiple comparison, although it is very close to significance (n = 31, p = 0.0514) – see Figure 8 .

Results show significant monovariate differences in survival for 9 tumor types (BLCA, CESC, GBM, LGG, KICH, KIRC, KIRP, MESO, STAD (see Figure 4 legend for abbreviations, all p-values < 0.05; Figure 4B ), with uveal melanoma (UVM) also being very close to significance (p-value = 0.052) ( Supplementary Figure 5 ).

Again, in this aspect, evidence on the goodness of using CHX plus chitosan for the prevention of pain after third molar surgery derives exclusively from two clinical trials which, although by definition do not support solid evidence, yield a result very close to significance ( p = 0.052), suggesting that new research studies probably allow confirmation of the benefits regarding the combination of both drugs.

Cannabis use showed a covariable effect (P = 0.001) and a very close to significance time effect (P = 0.052).

In particular, the study group exhibited a reduction in triglyceride levels very close to significance (baseline mean ± SEM: 69.59 ± 6.98 mg/dL; post-intervention: 62.80 ± 5.14 mg/dL; p = 0.053), while the control group did not experience a significant variation.

The correlation between Lipid balance index and EVA was also very close to significance (r = 0.24, p = 0.053, 95% Confidence interval for r: −0.002516 to 0.4553).

Differences between groups after the intervention were very close to significance ( p = 0.054).

The correlation of the CH with the OSDI was very close to significance ( p = 0.055), supporting this assumption.

The second passage of MPs through the digestive tract of the crayfish also resulted in a significant reduction in MPs volume compared to control 2 only (planned contrast; p = 0.006; Table S2 ; Figure 2 ), although the difference for control 1 was very close to significance (planned contrast; p = 0.057; Table S2 ; Figure 2 ).

As for clinical fractures, the comparison was very close to significance ( p =.057), in fact, in the cohort of patients with osteoporosis and degraded TBS, 9 patients had clinical fractures (29.0%), while those with osteoporosis and non-degraded TBS had a smaller number of clinical fractures ( N = 4; 10.8%).

The only two variables that demonstrated sex-specific differences were ABS (χ 2 = 3.83, p = 0.050) and SMM, where the difference was very close to significance (χ 2 = 3.59, p = 0.058) ( Table 3 ).

However, such a difference was very close to significance also in the ET [ t (22) = −2.65, p = 0.059, d = −0.53], and the Bayes factor value (BF 10 = 3.6) provided moderate support to the alternative hypothesis.

= 0.2, z = 2.9, p = 0.004), and very close to significance in the high-frequency condition ( β = 0.37, s.e. = 0.2, z = 1.85, p = 0.06). 4 However, it is also considerably worse than the recognition memory task, which indicates that word forms were learned much better than the meaning of their stems.

However, the LFR results analyzed returned a probability value very close to significance ( p = 0.0606).

Statistically significant adverse effects on body weight were demonstrated for cisplatin treatment compared to the vehicle from Day 4 post-treatment to Day 13 (d4: p = 0.0006; d5: p = 0.0009; d8: p = 0.0012: d9: p < 0.0001; d10: p = 0.0002; d11–d13: p < 0.0001), except on Days 6 and 7 with results very close to significance ( p = 0.0619 and p = 0.0774, respectively) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

When comparing HHV6A positive MS and PTC cases, the Nogo-A level of the MS group was lower than that of the PTC group and this difference was very close to significance ( p = 0.063) ( Figure 1 ).

As for the difference in the measured relative miR expression, a p -value very close to significance ( p = 0.068) in the relative miR-484 expression between the MCI and control group, was observed.

About promotion of colon carcinogenesis in the rat model, we noted that compared to the cooked ham model produced with 120 mg/kg of sodium nitrite (Ni-120), the reduction of sodium nitrite to 90 mg/kg (Ni-90) induced a reduction in the number of the preneoplastic lesions MDF (mucin depleted foci) per colon, while the removal (Ni-0) induced an effect very close to significance ( p = 0.069) (Fig. 4A ).

In addition, a lower value for total sitting time in males was very close to significance ( p = 0.076).

The internal age-group comparison revealed that the frequency of cat allergy among those seven years and older had decreased compared to the pre-pandemic period, and the statistical difference was very close to significance (p=0.08).