borderline significancep = 0.042
Calves raised in the pastoral system were predicted to have approximately double the odds of having diarrhea compared to mixed crop–livestock calves, but this finding had borderline significance ( p = 0.042).
Calves raised in the pastoral system were predicted to have approximately double the odds of having diarrhea compared to mixed crop–livestock calves, but this finding had borderline significance ( p = 0.042).
Only peptidase activator activity, represented in part by FBLN1 , was nominally significant (adjusted p = 0.043; Table S5 ).
However, the p value of the protected site before and after implementation showed a highly significant difference (Kruskal–Wallis; χ 2 = 11.386, df = 5, p -value = 0.044) ( Figure 9 C). 4.
A Mann–Whitney U-test showed a slightly significant difference among gender (Z = −1.996, p = 0.046), with males estimating species richness slightly higher.
Moreover, single SNPs with a borderline significance were detected on BTA5 ( p = 0.0468) and BTA23 ( p = 0.0356).
A mildly significant interaction ( p = 0.047) between behaviour and diet was observed in Study 1 ( Figure 3 ).
Egger’s test resulted in a marginally significant publication bias in the dataset (intercept = 6.4, df = 32; p = 0.047).
There was a marginally significant difference (Global R = 0.03, p = 0.048) in prey importance value percentages between toad sexes in golf course Community B.
There was a marginally significant interaction between training session and group, F (8, 56) = 2.12, p = 0.048, η ρ 2 = 0.23.
The fit of the owner’s characterstics model demonstrated a trend towards significance ( p = 0.049 ) and explained only 7% of the variance, while the pet–human relationship explained only 5% of the variance ( Table 2 ).
There was a marginally significant main effect with a medium effect size [F(1, 66) = 4.02, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.050; p bonf = 0.008] ( Figure 3 ).
For provinces in Korea, there was no positive trend between the proportion of dogs that tested positive and the recorded burden of human disease (Spearman’s r = 0.261, p = 0.469), whereas there was a positive trend between the proportion of cats that tested positive and the recorded burden of human disease (Spearman’s r = 0.649, p = 0.049) ( Figure 2 ). 4.
The effects of different diet on body weight of both buffalo breeds were highly significant ( p < 0.05) throughout the experimental period.
Semen analysis showed a borderline significant difference between the group with triple-biopsy where sperm count was lower than it in the control group (14.5 mill/mL vs. 17.5 mill/mL, p = 0.05).
The results were presented as the means ± SD, and the significant and extremely significant levels were set at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. 3.
The index measured was taken as the statistical unit, and the results were expressed as “mean ± standard error”, where p < 0.01 meant that the difference was extremely significant, and p < 0.05 meant that the difference was significant. 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1 indicates a trend. 3.
Conversely, the relative abundances of certain beneficial bacteria in the T2 group increased or showed an increasing trend, e.g., Bifidobacterium ( p < 0.05), Lactobacillus ( p = 0.298), Bacillus ( p = 0.550) ( Figure 2 C).
Differences in scratch-associated mortality between track classes ( Table 3 ), did not reach statistical significance at p = 0.05.
Over the study period, both Swamp and Murrah crossbred buffaloes showed an increasing trend of calves’ birth with an average annual increase of 18 calves for Swamp and 46 calves for the Murrah crossbred buffaloes; significantly ( p < 0.05), calves’ birth was more than the Swamp buffaloes.
Co-treatment with BM-MSCs and beetroot created markedly significant ( p ≤ 0.05) decrease (127.8 ± 22.78 pg/mL) over the Cis group ( Figure 5 ). 3.2.4.
The survival rate showed a highly significant enhancement in control and fucoidan-fed groups compared with ATZ or fucoidan/ATZ groups ( p < 0.05).
Following 2 h of LXA4 treatment in infected cells, TNF-α mRNA expression exhibited no statistically significant reduction, although a decreasing trend was observed ( p > 0.05).
However, Faith’s PD was higher in the larger space, showing marginal significance (8.6 ± 2.5 vs. 11.6 ± 4.0, p = 0.05, Figure 2 D).
Although the cecum microbiota exhibited an increasing trend, no significant difference was detected ( p > 0.05; Figure S2 ).
Long-term trend analyses resulting from the weighted least square linear regression (WLS), highlighted a significant positive trend (T%) for 34 species (ranging from + 12,060% for the Great Cormorant to + 14.45% for the Eurasian Blackcap), negative for 18 species, 12 of which experienced a population decrease larger than 50%, while 24 species did not show a significant trend ( p value > 0.05; Table 1 and Figure S2 ). 3.2.