Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,234 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
WAI was highly significant for the linear terms of the barrel temperature ( X 1 ) and the feed moisture content ( X 2 ) ( p < 0.01), and the quadratic terms of the barrel temperature ( X 1 ) ( p < 0.001) and the feed moisture content ( X 2 ) ( p < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, the interactive effects of phenolic extract concentration-drying temperature and phenolic extract concentration-feed flow rate were significant ( p < 0.05); and the interaction between drying temperature and feed flow rate was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
An additional correlation analysis ( Table 3 ) resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.01) correlation coefficients that ranged between 0.71 (between Fe nutritional yield and Cu nutritional yield) and 0.95 (between yield and Mg nutritional yield) for the five variables studied (yield; and Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mg nutritional yield). 3.3.
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
In addition, as fluctuation in the temperature of the storage environment increased, the correlation between some indicators was enhanced, for example, the correlation between ADP and some indicators (such as EL, MDA, O 2 · − , H 2 O 2 , etc.) changed from significant ( p < 0.05) to extremely significant ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 8 A–C).
highly significantp ≤ 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In ‘Surkh’, storage interval had a highly significant effect on chilling injury ( p ≤ 0.01), and TG-coated fruit consistently exhibited lower injury; at 20 days of cold storage plus 2 days at 20 °C ± 1 °C, TG-treated fruit recorded an injury score of 3.4 compared with 4.0 in the control ( Figure 2 B).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Upon age stratification, the <40 years group and the ≥40 years group exhibited markedly different mean score distributions ( Figure 1 ): the <40 years group mean was 3.87 ± 0.15, and the ≥40 years group mean was 2.28 ± 0.21, with Welch’s t -test confirming the difference was highly significant (t = 47.46, p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A more detailed comparison revealed that the group treated with n -butanol was 32.81%, 47.67%, and 29.25% lower than that of the control group at d 7, 14, and 35 d of storage, respectively, which was highly significant ( p < 0.01), and Figure 8 b shows that the level of expression of CmPLD-β in the group treated with n -butanol was lower than that in the control group at the selected storage time points, which was consistent with the PLD activity ( Figure 8 a).