The standardized regression coefficient of the transformational psychological leadership style and organizational growth performance is 0.630, showing an extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
As shown in Table 10 , the simple effect of the number of measurements in the experimental group was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Although the association between intensity and liking was highly significant, F (1, 151.45) = 122.67, p < 0.001, the interaction between emotion type and presentation frequency was eliminated.
Behavioral EI had a highly significant relationship (β = 0.64, p < 0.001, n = 100) with perceived leadership effectiveness and no relationship with engagement ( Miller, 2014 ).
As expected, there was a highly significant main effect of tempo, with faster rates producing shorter ITIs [ F (2,100) = 9559.96, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.995].
That study yielded highly significant reductions in self-reported anxiety and stress ( p < 0.001), indicating that tapping alone can produce robust outcomes and highlighting the importance of further research into the mechanisms involved. 3.2.3.
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.87, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the data were suitable for the analysis.
Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses produced a highly significant main effect of time ( F = 66.17, p < 0.001), accompanied by a large effect size (partial η 2 = 0.68).
Chi-square analyses between group and suggestion within each social influence condition revealed a highly significant effect (χ 2 = 12.0, df = 1, p = 0.001), in the no social influence condition (thus replicating Wiseman and Greening, 2005 ) with 10 participants (33.3%) reporting that the key continued to bend if given the verbal suggestion compared to none in the no-suggestion condition.
Once again, the results of this correlation analyses show that both lostness measures correlate negatively with learning, yet this time the correlation is significant for global lostness ( p = 0.015) and highly significant for local lostness ( p = 0.001).
Crucially, there was also a highly significant interaction of Interference and Target Dimension [Dutch: F (1) = 16.53, p = 0.001, r 2 = 0.09; Brazilian: F (1) = 8.69, p = 0.003, r 2 = 0.05], indicating that the effect of cross-dimensional interference was much greater for duration judgments than for distance judgments (Figure 1 ).
Seven of the 9 differences are highly significant with p < 0.001.
By the same token, high IAS total scores were associated with high scores on TAS-20 and with high scores on two components of TAS-20, “difficulty identifying feelings” and “difficulty describing feelings.” The results from the regression analysis showed that Interoception was a moderately significant predictor of Alexithymia, explaining 13% of the variance (beta = 0.37, p < 0.001).
For Place of Articulation , a highly significant main effect was found across all three CLMMs (unaspirated: χ 2 (2) = 21.87, p < 0.001; aspirated: χ 2 (2) = 47.38, p < 0.001; fricatives: χ 2 (2) = 25.98, p < 0.001).
It is also worth noting that, after performing a bivariate analysis on the impact of age on trust, we found a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001), with 86.1% of elderly respondents (56–85 years old) expressing high trust in public authorities, whereas this percentage drops to 69.6% for participants in between 18 and 40 years of age: this further confirms the role of vulnerability to the COVID-19 virus in eliciting higher attributions of trust, and it is consistent with previous findings on a negative correlation between age and willingness to comply with social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic ( Wirz et al., 2020 ).
Also R 2 change due to inclusion of the quadratic function was highly significant: F (1, 4902) = 2478.4, p = 0.001.
The analysis revealed a highly significant effect on the model fit [ χ 2 (1) = 222.59, p < 0.001].
Highly significant effects were found again for block (Means: Block 1 = 1701.19, Block 2 = 1551.71; F = 116.29, SE = 14.87, df = 228.69, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.34) and sentence direction (Means: Away 1579.23, Toward 1614.28, No-transfer 1685.42; F = 21.63, SE = 19.3, df = 283.74, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.16).
Total reading time The analysis revealed a highly significant main effect of semantic relation on the noun region, β = 99.68, SE = 6.74, t = 14.79, p < 0.001.
Results of the ANOVA indicated that the main effect of Motion was highly significant [ F (1, 11) = 31.080, p < 0.001], which was also true for that of Duration [ F (2, 22) = 56.407, p < 0.001].
For sP and sDHEA, no moderation effects were observed, while for sE2, a positive trend for hostility ( R 2 = 0.3418, p = 0.001; B = 0.1168, SE = 0.0687, p = 0.0922, R 2 change = 0.0192) and physical aggression ( R 2 = 0.3605, p < 0.001; B = 0.0860, SE = 0.0493, p = 0.0841, R 2 change = 0.0197) emerged.
The results show that the number of patents of invested enterprises has an extremely significant positive correlation with the human capital index ( P < 0.001), and a significant positive correlation with the education level of personnel, the proportion of engineering professionals ( P < 0.05).
This was confirmed by an ANOVA analysis which showed a main effect of valence ( df = 1, F = 18.05, p < 0.001), no effect of semantic category ( df = 1, F = 2.94, p > 0.1), and contrary to the other emotional parameters, a highly significant interaction between semantic valence and semantic category ( df = 1, F = 35.6, p < 0.001).
All correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001, Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.0018) and in the expected direction thereby confirming our assumptions: While COM was strongly positively associated with ESC, BDI was strongly negatively related to both, COM as well as ESC, before and after treatment.
Half of the high TCT-DP group came from the fourth-cluster members ( n = 10) and this difference in distributions was highly significant, χ 2 ( df = 3, N = 40) = 16.37, p < 0.001, Cramer’s Φ = 0.64.