In sensitivity analyses with previous VR experience recoded as a binary variable, the interaction terms were not significantly significant in models with perceived restorativeness or in models with negative affect, p > 0.05.
Excerpts
(e) OS shows marginal significance ( p < 0.05) in the 5% quantile and strong significance ( p < 0.001) in the 25% and 50% quantiles.
Again, males have a worst perception (M = 63.66, SD = 27.73) than females (M = 67.95, SD = 26.16), although the difference is barely significant ( t = −1.59, df = 646, p = 0.05, d = 0.12).
Subsequent paired-samples t -tests indicated that there was a significant increase in premature responding over sessions for Hole B [ t (9) = 3.0, p = 0.01] and a marginally significant increase for Hole C [ t (9) = 2.3, p = 0.05].
Education was marginally significant too, but with a very small effect size [ F (1,80) = 3.97, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.05].
Results *Note: Statistical significance is denoted consistently throughout the manuscript as follows: + p < 0.1 (marginally significant), * p < 0.05 , ** p < 0.01 , ** p < 0.001 .
Equality constraints were then imposed upon the autoregressive parameters, which did lead to a marginally significant decrement in model fit, χ 2 change = 9.59, df = 4, p = 0.05.
Gender Effects on Coding Accuracy In Model c , reported in Figure 3 , the direct effect of gender on coding accuracy at T2 approaches statistical significance (B = 0.37, p = 0.05).
For measures of latency noise, correlations between RT and TOJ tasks and between TOJ and 2xSJ tasks were marginally significant (one-tailed bootstrap p < 0.05).
The univariate ANOVA performed on accuracy using the number of errors as the dependent variable showed that the main effect of group was marginally significant [ F (1,35) = 3.92, p = 0.05, MSE = 2.34, partial η 2 = 0.10, 1-β error prob = 0,38].
However, the responses for dynamic proximal and momentary distal cues were marginally insignificant (goodness-of-fit χ 2 test: χ 2 = 3.739, df = 1, p = 0.05).
The second measure of self-reported anxiety (SCARED) also revealed a borderline significant change over time [ F (2, 12) = 3.41, p = 0.050].
One-factorial ANOVAs for the factor session for the patients and controls separately with target locations either PRL or OppPRL indicated a marginally significant quadratic trend (blue line in Figure 7 , upper right panel) for the control group [ F (1,9) = 5.05; p = 0.05, not corrected for multiple comparisons; otherwise p = 0.1, Bonferroni corrected].
There was a marginally significant PoA × VOT interaction in medial aspects of the left AC, but only when the extent threshold was reduced to an uncorrected cluster size of p < 0.05, while keeping the peak threshold at p < 0.001.
As the sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics were weakly correlated [i.e., coefficients of Pearson's correlation were lower than 0.5 and highly significant ( p < 0.05); see Supplementary material for full results], they were included as controls variables in our econometric analysis.
In addition, trust in people had a marginally significant effect on social empathy ( β = 0.100, p ≤ 0.05), and had a significant effect on subjective well-being ( β = 0.223, p < 0.001).
a trend toward significancep = 0.05
The AE group also showed significant effects of time on RTs ( F (2, 32) = 14.17, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.469), with significant improvements from Pre to Post-0 ( t = 7.28, p = 0.0003, d = 1.24) and a trend toward significance from Post-0 to Post-20 ( t = 3.533, p = 0.05, d = 0.61).
There was a marginally significant tendency for congruence [ F (1, 61) = 4.011, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.062, BF 10 = 1.129].
We observed a significant effect of meaning modulation [ F 1(2, 167) = 12.23, p < 0.001; F 2(2, 327) = 24.97, p < 0.001], as well as a significant effect of set type in the by item analysis and marginally significant in the by subject analysis [ F 1(2, 167) = 2.95, p = 0.05; F 2(2, 327) = 9.46, p < 0.001].
In contrast, exposure to organizational vision had a marginally significant negative indirect effect through CWB ( β = −0.02, p = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.00] ).
The Picture type main effect in the Task sequence neutral-affective was only marginally significant, F (2, 28) = 3.86, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.22, ε = 0.71 ( Figure 6 ).
The research conducted by Di (2022) indicates that cultural adaptation showed a moderately significant positive correlation with Chinese language proficiency ( p < 0.05), and a significantly positive correlation with enrollment management, teaching management, differentiated management, recognition of administrative staff, and teaching satisfaction (all p < 0.01).
Gender also had a marginally significant interaction with the within subjects factor F (1, 99) = 3.64 ( p = 0.05) η 2 = 0.04, observed power was 0.47 and this interaction effect is presented in Figure 4 .
borderline non-significantp = 0.05
The moderation effect of workplace affiliation dispositions on the relation between confrontative coping and goal attainment was found to be borderline non-significant (E( moderation effect ) = 0.15, 95% CI [−0.001, 0.330], p = 0.05).
In addition, these regions are marginally more predictive earlier in learning relative to later in learning, with left pars orbitalis (or inferior frontal gyrus) showing a marginally significant ( p < 0.05) decrease in predictive accuracy at M 300.