Excerpts

A paired samples t -test showed that there was a marginally significant difference ( t = -2.024, df = 35, p = 0.051) in the difference in pitch range (Tones 4 – 1) between IDS (mean = 97.724 Hz, sd = 75.934) and ADS (mean = 66.987 Hz, sd = 60.927).

The difference between the first and second transfer phases approached significance (Mean Difference = −0.456, p = 0.051), with a Cohen’s d of-1.813, reflecting a large effect size but indicating that this difference was less consistent or reliable compared to the other comparisons ( Table 2 ) ( Figure 5 ). 5 Discussion The present study investigated the impact of implicit and explicit learning on motor task performance across three sessions.

The difference between major and minor music conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

Consistent with the Indifference Points analyses, there was a marginally significant difference between the steepness of the discount rates overall in the nap and wake tasks within subjects [ F (1,18) = 4.375, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.196], and similarly a marginally significant decrease in steepness when comparing k before and after a nap or wake interval [ F (1,18) = 3.677, p = 0.071, η p 2 = 0.170].

According to the reduced model the proportion of L2 speakers had an inverse and borderline significant effect on the degree of inflectional synthesis (log(λ) = −0.398 ± 0.21; χ 2 (1) = 3.798; p = 0.051).

Visual features as predictor for concreteness/abstractness just failed to reach significance ( p = 0.051).

All measures assessing the same ability were significantly positively intercorrelated, except for the linguistic accuracy scores (although the correlation between the verbal fluency and lexical decision task was marginally significant: p = 0.051, r = 0.20), linguistic speed scores (for which the correlation was negative), and the flanker and Simon inhibition scores.

The relationship for Black suspects just missed significance ( p = 0.051).

4.5.2 Differences in the degree of recognition of Xin in Chinese culture among different groups 4.5.2.1 Differences by gender A marginally significant difference ( p = 0.051) in the recognition of Xin in Chinese culture was observed ( Table 7 ), with males having a lower degree of recognition than females.

And also showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.051) effect on learning.

The difference between sequential intervals was partially significant [ F (7,84) = 2.112, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.150] and the effect of intercept was not significant [ F (1,12) = 0.291, p = 0.599, η 2 = 0.024].

The analyses of the accuracy data only showed a small (1.8%) advantage of the identity condition over the same-shape substituted-letter condition that approached significance, coefficient = −0.16065, SE = 0.08215, z = 1.95, p = 0.051, whereas there were no signs of a difference between same-shape and different-shape substituted-letter conditions, | z | < 1.

Specifically, across the 60 associated coefficients, only one was significant: employment tenure had a small and marginally significant effect on motivating others ( b = –0.01, p = 0.051).

Relatedness had a near-significant effect on plausibility ( B = 0.09, p = 0.051).

There was a marginally significant effect of “time period” on general stress scores: F (1.87,216.49) = 3.10, p = 0.051.

Levene’s test was close to significance ( p = 0.051), indicating slightly higher variance in the patients’ group.

A main effect of congruency was found, F (1,57) = 102.6, MSE = 64,955, p < 0.001, a marginally significant effect was found for group, F (2,57) = 2.64, MSE = 37,202, p = 0.051, and no significant interaction effect was found, F < 1.

This effect of framing condition was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between framing condition and age [ X 2 (2)=5.93, p =0.051]; specifically, the effect of the Extrinsic framing condition relative to the Neutral framing condition grew significantly less strong over development [ b =1.92, SE =0.88, 95% CI (0.19, 3.66), p =0.03], but no such age-related change was observed in the effect of the Intrinsic framing condition relative to the Neutral framing condition ( p =0.82).

Although the variable” perceived health status” was not retained in the final model, it demonstrated marginal significance in the initial model ( p = 0.051) with a negative regression coefficient ( β = −0.287).

In addition, there was a main effect for mode-of-thought [ F (1,96)=6.24, p <0.05], as well as a marginally significant order × mode-of-thought interaction [ F (5,92)=2.31, p=0 .051].

Conscientiousness showed a marginally significant negative correlation with NA ( r = −0.231, p = 0.051), while extraversion and agreeableness were not significantly related to overall NA ( p > 0.05).

For the best friend group, the effect of rating type approached significance, F (2,116) = 3.05, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.050.

The results show a marginally significant negative effect of health literacy on beliefs in myths (a1: β = −0.064, p = 0.051, CI [−0.128, 0.000]).

The path analysis revealed that there were significant direct effects of the intrusive rumination soon after the earthquake on PTSD and PTG, and the relation between PTSD and PTG was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

The same model was marginally significant for gesture imitation, F (7,101) = 2.10, p = 0.051, R = 0.36, R 2 = 0.13.