Still, in our study, general criminality showed a trend level positive correlation with total malevolent creativity of revenge ideas ( r = 0. 18, p = 0 .072), suggesting that malevolent creativity tests may capture a certain albeit very small aspect of real-life behavior after all (see Supplementary part D ).
The main effect of set size was significant [ F (3.02, 184.14) = 24.81, p < 0.001]; the main effect of complexity was significant [ F (1, 61) = 8.68, p = 0.005]; the main effect of interference was not significant [ F (1, 61) = 2.09, p = 0.153]; the interaction between set size and complexity was marginally significant [ F (3.02, 184.14) = 2.37, p = 0.072]; the interaction between set size and interference was not significant [ F (3.02, 184.14) = 0.60, p = 0.618]; the interaction between complexity and interference was not significant [ F (1, 61) = 0.93, p = 0.339]; the interaction between these 3 variance was not significant [ F (3.02, 184.14) = 0.73, p = 0.535].
Specifically, greater attachment security, β = 0.30, p = 0.009, the interaction between child attachment security and parental scaffolding, β = 0.23, p = 0.048, and child age, β = 0.02, p < 0.001, predicted greater exploration in children, whereas the main effect of parental scaffolding was marginally significant, β = 0.20, p = 0.072.
Extraversion was a marginally significant positive predictor in both the second, β = 0.12, SE = 0.04, p = 0.072, and the third, β = 0.11, SE = 0.04, p = 0.088, steps.
In addition, education level has a marginally significant negative effect on health behaviors ( β = −0.05, p = 0.072), meaning that the health behaviors performance of the public with a higher education background is not as excellent as that of the public with a lower education background.
With respect to sample size, the raw n specification showed a marginal trend, b ≈ 0.000, 95% CI [−0.000, 0.000], p = 0.072, explaining 2.07% of heterogeneity, whereas the log-transformed N was clearly nonsignificant ( p = 0.619).
The main effect of Block-Order was not significant, F (1,44) = 0.08, p = 0.780, and the main effect of Depiction had a trend toward significance, F (1,44) = 3.39, p = 0.072, with a suggested advantage of faster naming of photographs over line drawings (888 ms for photographs, and 901 ms for line-drawings).
Although, the python jar was poked at a higher frequency than the leopard jar was poked, this difference only approached significance ( F (1,13) =3.850, p =0.072; Cohen’s d =1.1).
While the results only showed a small trend for age differences in FTP [FTP; χ ( 4 , 95 ) 2 = 8.60, p = 0.072], there were differences for past time perspective [PTP; F (4, 95) = 5.68, p < 0.001].
The change in fillers approached significance ( p = 0.072).
For upper back pain, the model approached significance (χ 2 (7) = 13.02, p =.072), with one device category emerging as a significant predictor (p =.048).
The distributional analysis revealed a marginally significant interaction between HighNo and Bin2 (β = −0.22, z = −1.8, p = 0.072).
The interaction between T1 resting RSA and social adversity was marginally significant for T2 internalizing ( b = -1.08, t = 1.82, p = 0.072) ( Table 4 ).
For the connective ALTHOUGH, we observed a marginally significant interaction between factors, F (1,35) = 3.44, p = 0.072, η p 2 = 0.09 such that, for alternative trials, responses were faster in the left-to-right direction than in the right-to-left direction, p = 0.025 ( M = 481 vs. 537 ms).
Proportion of Total Looking Time to the Area of Interest In the DLD group the GLM showed a significantly higher proportion of looks to the semantic-syntactic trials object compared to the typical trials object (β = 0.568, se = 0.202, z = 2.810, p = 0.005), and a marginally significant visual preference for the semantic condition object (β = 0.345, se = 0.192, z = 1.792, p = 0.073).
Similarly, the corresponding ANOVA of the N170 peak amplitude revealed a significant main effect of infant facial expression [ F (2,124) = 5.55, p = 0.008, η 2 = 0.082], with statistically significant larger amplitudes for joy infant faces (-8.23 ± 0.88 μV) than for crying ones (-7.79 ± 0.85 μV) ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant larger amplitudes than for neutral ones (-7.90 ± 0.86 μV) ( p = 0.073).
GI has a statistically significant effect, above and beyond the role of sex, on all the PYD variables ( p’ s < 0.05), and a marginally significant effect on Empathy ( p = 0.073).
Planned comparisons at the 50 ms SOA condition showed that mediated priming was significantly smaller than direct priming ( p < 0.003) and was also smaller than backward priming, although the latter effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.073).
At the Pz electrode, a marginally significant main effect of image category was found in the female group: Females: F (2,12) = 3.29, p = 0.073, η 2 p = 0.35.
There was an almost significant 7 four-way interaction of all the factors involved in the experiment (i.e., congruency × visual field × SOA × gender), F (3,174) = 2.36, p = 0.073, η p 2 = 0.04.
When controlling for post-Encoding affect, the relationship with percent time in NREM2 sleep remained marginally significant (partial r = 0.344, p = 0.073), suggesting that NREM2 sleep during the nap may be associated with improvement in affect.
(2024) , the accuracy data analysis in this study revealed only main effects of prime type, χ 2 (1) = 21.64, p < 0.001, and translation direction, χ 2 (1) = 53.45, p < 0.001, with the accuracy rates being significantly higher for the targets preceded by translation primes (2.29% difference) and in the L2–L1 direction (6.39% difference), as well as a marginally significant main effect of the number of translations, χ 2 (1) = 3.22, p = 0.073, with a higher accuracy rate for OTPs (1.18% difference).
Although it did not correlate significantly with the overall M Total , r (282) = −0.023, p = 0.696, the correlation of Conscientiousness with the Repetitive Sounds factor was marginally significant, r (171) = −0.137, p = 0.073.
There was a marginal significance in the three-way interaction between Electrodes, Determiner Type, and Grammaticality ( F (2, 70) = 3.038, p = 0.073, η p 2 = 0.080), indicating that the RDP condition at Pz showed a significant P600 effect ( p = 0.048), whereas the QDP condition did not.
Frame was once again significant in Model 2, and ZPT approached significance, as did the Model 2 improvement of fit, F change (5, 309) = 2.04, adjusted R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.073.