Excerpts

As for significance level, p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 was considered significant, and p ≥ 0.05 was considered insignificant. 3.

There was an increasing trend in UI prevalence with age in both sexes (both p < 0.05; Table 2 ).

The effect of WfH group walks in green corridor environments was marginally significant (β = 0.15, p = 0.05). 3.2.2.

We also found a marginally significant difference in knowledge change across gender identity (H = 6.44, p < 0.05), with respondents who responded with an identity other than male or female (which includes both non-conforming/non-binary and those who preferred not to answer) reporting the greatest change between pre- and post-assessments (mean rank = 182.34).

It was close to significance in the case of grocery workers ( F = 3.20 and p = 0.05), who showed lower psychological impacts in May–June ( M = 36.88 and SD = 19.60) than in March ( M = 47.82 and SD = 18.77) and April ( M = 45.72 and SD = 16.15), but the post-hoc Tuckey test revealed no significant differences. 3.2.

Conversely, the increase in the surfactant concentration did not promote a significant trend to the zeta potential of the SLNs ( p < 0.05), which presented negative surface charge with values of −15 to −10 mV.

There were no differences between control and exposed groups in terms of height, weight, or smoking status ( p = 0.18, 0.20, 0.98, respectively); age was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) with the mean age in the control group slightly higher than that of the exposed group.

When significant and marginally significant ( i.e. , p < 0.05 and p ≤ 0.10) variables from the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate analysis, both age and reason for migration remained statistically significant with p < 0.05. 3.2.

Contact with infected animals, consumption of raw milk and socioeconomic status showed a highly significant ( p < 0.05) correlation with seropositivity.

Among females, the model accounted for 7% of the variance in depressive symptoms; however, only screen-based sedentary behavior was the marginally significant predictor (β = 0.14, p = 0.05).

Lastly, consumption of cereal most or all days was protective of asthma (OR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.45–0.99), although borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

Additionally, a Kruskal–Wallis test considering the different levels confirmed these differences as highly significant ( p < 0.05).

The non-fatal accident rate in the whole forestry industry showed a decreasing trend in the study period (t = 2.27, p < 0.05).

After 24 h contact, there is still no difference between (B) and (A) samples, while it appeared a highly significant difference among the studied GCs (two-way ANOVA test, p = 0.05).

Female students showed a borderline significant, higher likelihood of appropriate knowledge compared with male students (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.999–2.65; p = 0.050), while age group was not significantly associated with knowledge ( Table 6 ).

A statistical trend was declared when one indicator was significant and the other one was not (e.g., p > 0.05 and Cohen’s d ≥ 0.2).

Moreover, a trend towards significance was found for the task (F 1.61 = 3.82; p = 0.05; ηp 2 = 0.06; Figure 4 B) showing a better performance in the Color (1.28 ± SE 0.25) with respect to Valence task (1.22 ± SE 0.26).

Despite approaching significance in boys at the p < 0.05 level, the effect was small relative to the other effects in boys (e.g., comparison to beta coefficients for thin-ideal internalisation and the social media use x muscular-ideal internalisation interaction).

Values where p <0.001 were considered highly significant while values where p <0.05 were considered significant on the average.

On the other hand, weight phobia and compulsive self-image control are at the limits of significance ( p = 0.05).

ot included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 2 green exercise participants ( M = 4.378) were significantly greater than those of Level 3 green exercise ( M = 3.506) ( p = 0.011); (3) the main effect of experimental treatment on the number of posture transitions nearly reached significance ( F (2,89) = 3.99, p = 0.05 , η p 2 = 0.064), with a moderate effect size, and zero was included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 3 green exercise participants ( M = 12.030) were almost significantly greater than those of Level 2 green exercise ( M = 4.650) ( p = 0.050); (4) the interaction between experimental treatment and social interaction on the number of sitting posture reached significance ( F (2,89) = 4.246, p = 0.044 , η p 2 = 0.068), with a moderate effect size, and zero was not included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference.

A borderline significant interaction was also found for KTK single-lever jumps (F = 4.1, p = 0.05).

There was no significant difference between the four groups in the baseline condition of Schober’s test before the training programmes ( p = 0.358) and the difference was borderline significant between the four groups ( p = 0.050) after the training period.

The results ( Table 3 ) suggested that the group variable was not a significant predictor of job satisfaction at T2 ( p > 0.05) but was a marginally significant one at T3 ( p = 0.050), whereas age, gender, job tenure, education, and marriage were not significant at either interval ( p > 0.05).

The relationship is marginally significant for xylene/ethylbenzene ( p -value = 0.120), while the association between toluene and respiratory function is more highly significant ( p -value = 0.050).