Excerpts

Regarding the direct effect of environmental noise on sleep, only marginally significant effects were observed (0.05 < p < 0.1), and no clear trend was identified ( Table 4 ).

The adults’ history of psychotherapy indicated a weakly significant impact (ß 6 = 0.04; p < 0.1).

Model 4 ( Table 5 ) shows that none of the country characteristics reached statistical significance; however, the number of COVID-19 cases per million inhabitants during the first wave came close to significance at p = 0.10, the level set for the country-level variables.

Finally, self-efficacy has a positive effect on individual resilience (b = 0.552; p < 0.010), but the indirect effect on team resilience is only marginally significant (b = 0.111; p < 0.100).

Since this relatively small N limits our statistical power for adjusted models with eight covariates, we discuss “marginally significant” ( p < 0.10) associations in addition to significant ( p < 0.05) associations among our results. 3.

control group) and daily smoking status provided qualified support for Hypothesis 2, showing that for daily smokers, exposure to experimental condition affected policy support more considerably, with a marginally significant interaction effect ( F (1, 1124) = 2.83, p < 0.10).

The slope was positive for immigrant students, although only marginally significant (γ13 = 0.06, p < 0.1), indicating that these students had similar falls in academic self-concept to Spanish students.

There was also a downward trend (marginally significant, p < 0.1) for “Depression-depression,” but no characteristic trend was observed for “liveliness.” As for emotions (measured using PANAS), negative emotions were significantly ( p < 0.01) lower after the experience.

In all cases, the significance level was set at p < 0.05, and the marginal significance was set at p < 0.1.

Income has a slightly significant positive effects on being overweight or obese ( p < 0.1), but log of income squared has a significant negative effect on these ( p < 0.1).

For the experimental group, there was only one marginally significant relationship between AB index and sexual excitation score (SES, r = −0.48, p < 0.10).

p < 0.01 was interpreted as highly significant and p < 0.10 was interpreted as a trend.

The RR for an IQR PM 10 increase (7.3 mg/m 3 ) was 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.03) and borderline significant ( p < 0.10).

However, their effects were marginally significant at p < 0.10, explaining why Model 1 was significant.

The differences in mean pre-to-post assessment scores for students in different club types (school-based with and without a partner and non-school based with and without a partner) showed a trend ( p < 0.10) significance.

Some other factors were found to be marginally significant in predicting the odds of parental license to independent non-school travel (0.05 ≤ p < 0.1), including the factor variable for neighborhood support and positive peer influences (marginally positive) and eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch and the presence of walking/biking trails in the neighborhood (marginally negative).

The Bonferroni comparison between children of indulgent and uninvolved mothers was marginally significant ( p = 0.10).

However, personal opioid use was close to significance, with lower odds of being in the “High Stigma/High Punitive Policy” class ( p = 0.10), which would be expected.

Significance was set at p < 0.05, and marginal significance was set at p < 0.10.

This study observed that, at a marginally significant level ( p < 0.1), older adults exhibited better glycemic control, potentially due to a lower degree of insulin resistance and higher participation/engagement in programs [ 2 ].

Grade 1 falls (the least severe, causing no injury) were the most common in both years, and showed a marginally significant decrease in number (0.05 < p <0.1), while the differences for the more severe falls were never significant.

Predictors that were found to be marginally significant (p < 0.10) in the bivariate analyses were considered for inclusion in a stepwise regression model (p < 0.10 to enter and p < 0.10 to remain) to construct a final, season-specific model for each of the pollutants by season.

The average total effect was positive and marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Otherwise, the prevalence between bla NDM carrier and antibiotic usage in recent three months (including penicillin, floxacin, polymyxin and metronidazole), drinking status, physical exercise and diabetes were reported marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

The univariate ANOVA models were conducted using the outcome variables (i.e., COVID-19 peritraumatic distress and loneliness) to identify possibly significant sociodemographic covariates, using a criterion of p ≤ 0.10.