The immunoreactivity for MCP-1/ CCL2 in the polyps positively correlated with that for MCP-2/ CCL8 ( ρ = 0.46, p = 0.0001), while MCP-1/ CCL2′ s correlation with MCP-3/ CCL7 was weak and borderline significant ( ρ = 0.25, p = 0.047), and that between MCP-3/ CCL7 and MCP-2/ CCL8 was non-significant ( ρ = 0.25, p = 0.053). 3.2.
Excerpts
A borderline significant and weak positive correlation between ELP-3 and the smoking status of the CD patients was demonstrated (r = 0.196, p = 0.047) ( Supplementary Figure S1 and Table S1 ).
A significant trend was identified for increased mortality risk due to smoking duration ( p = 0.0474). 3.3.
Practicality showed marginal significance, with GPT-4 slightly outperforming Gemini ( p = 0.0476).
Differences in practicality were marginally significant when adjusting for ties (χ 2 = 6.091, df = 2, p < 0.0476), suggesting that Gemini may also have an advantage in this aspect.
was borderline significant (or rather suggestive when maintaining our definition of significance; p = 0.048).
DUDIT Cut-off Groups Compared with the PQ-B There was a difference between the DUDIT cut-off groups on the PQ-B total score (H = 11.2; p < 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis H test), and in the post-hoc multiple comparisons, there was only a borderline significant difference between the groups: ‘below cut-off’ and ‘drug-related problems’ (z = 2.65; p = 0.048).
247 ± 86.8 μm 2 with a borderline significant effect (−47.1 [−93.7; −0.5] p = 0. 048), which did not remain when adjusted for age and sex (−41.2 [−91.3; 8.9] p = 0.11).
Procedural parameters and radiation exposure dose varied between groups, but only radiation exposure time was marginally significant ( p = 0.048) ( Table 1 ).
For Criterion D, the presence of surgical complications showed a borderline significant association with surgical success ( p = 0.048).
However, a marginally significant difference in cylinder at 6 months was observed ( p = 0.048).
A novel finding in this reanalysis was the emergence of humor as an independent positive predictor (B = 0.424, SE = 0.189; t = 2.24, p = 0.026; 95% CI [0.05, 0.80]) and self-distraction showed a marginally significant protective association (B = −0.342, p = 0.048; 95% CI [−0.68, −0.003]) that should be interpreted with caution given that the confidence interval barely excludes zero.
Among the patients who had undergone transplantation procedure in our center, there was a marginally significant positive correlation between the urine NGAL concentration and the number of donor/recipient HLA mismatches (Spearman R = 0.31; p = 0.049).
found prior irradiation to be the only independent risk factor for wound dehiscence on logistic regression analysis, reflecting the potentially confounding influence of PMRT on complication profile, but this finding achieved only marginal significance ( p = 0.049) [ 34 ].
After adjusting for age, previous AKI, HTN, and pre-AKI kidney function, the odds ratio remained marginally significant at 1.02 (95% CI: 1.0–1.5), p = 0.049.
Regarding the relationships of muscle health with bone quantity and quality, there was a borderline significant association between bone quality and sarcopenia ( p = 0.049), but no significant association between osteoporosis and sarcopenia.
after: 0.78 ± 2.03, p -value < 0.001) were observed after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, while a marginally significant decrease was observed in time to laboratory test (before: 0.58 ± 1.57 vs. after: 0.56 ± 1.43, p -value = 0.049).
However, we acknowledge that the association of a lower FiO 2 requirements with barotrauma in our study was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.049) and might represent a chance finding.
The median time intervals between diagnosis and the receipt of different treatment modalities showed no significant changes, except for chemotherapy, which exhibited a marginally significant increase in the median time interval in 2021 compared to 2019 ( p = 0.049).
Evaluating the stabilization timings for 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, and 7 months in association with bone variables, a significant trend resulted only for the woven bone volumes ( p = 0.049).
The comparison of allele frequencies between the responder and nonresponder groups revealed a nominally significant difference for the rs235770 polymorphism ( p = 0.049).
In group B, all the corneal front parameters were statistically significant, with K2 approaching borderline significance ( p = 0.049).
The treatment group demonstrated a positive trend in fine balance coordination tests ( p = 0.049); however, the small sample size and variability in control group performance suggest caution in interpreting these findings.
In a sensitivity analysis using Cox regression stratified by propensity score quintiles, the association remained borderline significant (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10–1.00, p = 0.049).
Differences among the three groups are only marginally significant statistically ( p -value = 0.0495). 3.2.4.