Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,102 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Within-group longitudinal analyses across 2 time points (by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) confirmed stable over time TNF-α levels in the evolocumab group (all p > 0.1), whereas in the control group a borderline significant increase was observed at 72 h vs. baseline ( p = 0.053) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
Interestingly, the severity of IBD at the time of the second diagnosis almost reached statistical significance ( p = 0.053) in relation to improvement, which might suggest that the timing of the therapy modification in relation to disease severity is crucial.
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
A nonsignificant trend toward an increased short-term (2.0% vs. 1.2%, RR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.99–2.78, p = 0.053) and long-term (4.7% vs. 3.5%, incident rate ratio: 1.40, 95% CI: 0.97–2.03, p = 0.07) all-cause mortality was also found, while no differences were found in long-term (1-year) mortality neither in short- or long-term follow-up for MI, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, stroke, major bleeding and the composite of MACEs [ 59 ].
borderline significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Comparison of the Arg-Dimethylation Indices between Boys and Men ( Table 3 ) Urinary creatinine concentrations of the white boys were higher (by 13.2%) than of the white men, with borderline significance ( p = 0.053), while the difference between black boys and men was not significant ( p = 0.122).
approaching significancep = 0.05301.1× alphagold
Factors Affecting the Risk of Malnutrition According to SGA Scale In the group diagnosed with non-squamous cell carcinoma, there was a 6.67-fold lower risk of moderate and severe malnutrition (SGA) approaching significance (OR = 0.15; p = 0.0530).
at the limit of significancep = 0.0531.1× alphagold
TAPSE/PASP remained significantly associated with a high risk of events using Cox univariate analysis (HR: 0.046; 95% CI [0.004–0.45], p = 0.009) but at the limit of significance in the clinical multivariate model (HR: 0.045; 95% CI [0.001–1.02], p = 0.053).
a trend towards significancep = 0.05311.1× alpha
No significant differences in the firing rate between groups after FDR correction for multiple comparisons were found, although DEX and REMI, and REMI in combination with CLONI showed a trend towards significance ( t (209) = 2.64, p = 0.0531; t (269) = 2.28, p = 0.0695).