Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Post hoc Dunnett tests comparing the experimental group with the control groups indicated significantly lower itch NRS scores in the positive expectation induction group ( M = 5.7, SD = 0.3) than in the negative expectation induction group ( M = 6.8, SD = 0.3) ( p <0.01) and marginally significant itch NRS scores in the positive expectation induction group than in the extinction group ( M = 6.5, SD = 0.3) ( p = 0.058).
nearly significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Pearson’s correlations revealed no significant relationships between average weekly caffeine consumption, Day 2 performance variability learning magnitudes and performance variability retention magnitudes (p>0.190 for all), but there was a nearly significant positive relationship between average weekly caffeine consumption and Day 1 performance variability learning magnitudes ( Fig 3B , r = 0.3760, p = 0.058).
showed a trendp = 0.0581.2× alpha
1XMETH significantly reduced density of TH fibers in SNpr (Two-way ANOVA, treatment p<0.001, F (2,48) = 98.444; p<0.001, post hoc Newman-Keuls test; Fig 5A, B ) in both Nurr1 +/+ (n = 10) and +/− (n = 10) mice; Nurr1 +/− mice showed a trend towards greater decrease in THir in SNpr (Two-way ANOVA, p = 0.058, post hoc Newman-Keuls test). 2XMETH caused a further reduction in TH fiber density in SNpr in both Nurr1 +/+ (n = 8) and +/− (n = 7) animals (Two-way ANOVA, p<0.001, post hoc Newman-Keuls test).
nearly significantp = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Effects of RhD, Smoking, and Interactions between These Variables on Health and Wellness Ordinal probit regression revealed nearly significant effect of age (p = 0.058) and signifiant effect of smoking-RhD interaction (p = 0.040) on health (number of viral and bacterial diseases in the past year).
close to significanceP = 0.0581.2× alpha
On the contrary, we found a trend towards a more positive correlation between visitation frequencies by honey-bees and native insects with increasing field isolation; the slope of the linear regression between (log) habitat proximity and the correlation coefficient estimated for each field was close to significance (−0.13+0.063, F 1,15 = 4.23, P = 0.058).