Excerpts

6E ); this difference showed a trend towards significance ( p = 0.06).

Similarly, the association between group and change in LDL cholesterol approached significance after accounting for the influence of BMI change ( p = .06; Table 6 , top panel; Fig 3 ).

Though there appears to be variation between years in the proportion of sightings reported in a yard or neighborhood, with more sightings submitted in yards or neighborhood after 2020, this difference is only marginally significant (χ 2 = 5.6, p = 0.06, Fig 4A ).

Repeated measures ANOVA revealed an almost significant condition main effect (F = 3.970, p = .060, η 2 = .166).

Results Regression analysis performed on carpal tunnel length revealed FE angle ( p = 0.006) and RUD angle ( p < 0.001) to be significant factors, while the FE RUD interaction approached significance ( p = 0.06) with an overall model R 2 of 0.95.

The placebo group showed no significant change in PCS from baseline to end-of-treatment (mean change –0.8 SEM ± 0.8 (p = 0.29)), while the omega-3 FA group showed a trend-level positive change in PCS from baseline to end-of-treatment (mean change 1.6 SEM ± 0.8 (p = 0.06)).

Pronoun type shows an effect on the EDA measure meaning that stories with 3 rd person pronouns showed a higher number of peaks in the EDA signal compared to 1 st person pronoun stories, a difference which almost reached statistical significance (β = 1.04, s.e. = 0.55, t = 1.89, p = 0.06, see S1 Statistical Models modeld2slopes , Fig 4 ).

There was also a marginally significant interaction effect ( b = .53, t (49) = 1.90, p = .06, d = .54), indicating that when participants wore the HoloLens, those who interacted with a partner that was virtually occluded by the Stanford logo felt marginally less connected to their partner than participants who interacted with a partner that was not virtually occluded ( b = .85, t (49) = 2.17, p = .03).

A similar, almost significant ( p = 0.06), effect was also observed for tumor necrosis factor-α.

Among the RD1 responders, the proportion of EM cells was almost significantly higher in BALC (96%) than in PB samples (88%) (p = 0.06).

No significant correlation of V0 and V1 to age, creatinine, eGFR or proteinuria at time of biopsy was detected, although the correlation of V1 to creatinine at biopsy was of borderline significance (R = 0.220, p = 0.06, table 3 ).

Follow-up showed that there were no response time differences across conditions for correct trials, F (2, 76) = 2.05, p = .14, but a response time difference across conditions approached significance for incorrect trials, F (2, 70) = 2.91, p = .06. η p 2 = .08.

In addition, when the models were adjusted for each of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors not influenced by treatment (age, ethnicity, smoking and diabetes) instead of the Framingham score, and also for the antiretroviral regimen composition (protease inhibitors vs non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), high seropositivity for varicella-zoster virus remained associated with carotid atherosclerosis (OR [95% CI] 5.27 [1.55–17.95], P = 0.008), and high seropositivity for cytomegalovirus was very close to significance (OR [95% CI] 3.27 [0.95–11.20], P = 0.06).

Line 406 p = .054 is defined as marginally significant; Line 419 p =.06 is defined as non-significant. 12.

Individuals whose first homelessness occurred at age 50 or older reported a higher prevalence of fair or poor health, at borderline significance (60.1% versus 50.0%, P = .06).

However, the Mann-Whitney one-sided test p-value was at the cusp of significance (p-value = 0.06) for families defined using BLAST criterion.

There was a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.06) among the different ICIC units in perceived usefulness, but the scores in this dimension all revealed good satisfaction (5.5–6.2).

The relationship between total CTRP3 and adiponectin approached significance (p = 0.06).

Furthermore a MANOVA of the Procrustes coordinates showed a trend towards sex differences in centroid size (F 1, 107 = 3.68, P = 0.06), with slightly larger male centroids, and in the size-corrected shape space (F 22, 2354 = 1.14, P = 0.08).

In 2016, there was a significant interaction between irrigation and grass origin in the North Field and a near-significant ( P = 0.06) interaction at the South Field ( Table 3(i) and 3(ii) ).

There was also marginally significant effect of item-type, F(1,54) = 3.839, p<0.06, which reflected the children's overall better performance on the even numbers – 2, 4 & 6 – than the odd numbers – 3, 5 & 7 – in both the pre- and post-tests.

P-content (percent of dry mass) was relatively high in normal samples ( Figure 1A ) from both kidney and liver (∼0.75–0.85%) compared to samples from colon and lung (∼0.55%), although this overall difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.06).

For lexical syllables fu1 , fu4 , and fu6 , the contrast between fu1 and fu6 elicited a significant negative cluster with a time window during 102–188 ms (post-divergence point unless specified otherwise) typical of an MMN (sum-T = −7.92, p <.01), and a marginally significant positive cluster (232–350 ms; sum-T = 5.04, p = .060) in the control group, which can be considered a P3a.

Results were marginally significant for acceptance ( F 1,93 = 2.59; p = .06; partial η 2 = .05) and non-significant for glycated hemoglobin ( F 1,93 = 0.54; p = .58; partial η 2 = .01).

However, the ratings for disgust and anger were positively skewed and thus we reran the analyses using their logarithm and observed the same results: a marginally significant interaction between the male-on-female violence condition and time ( p = .06), and no significant interactions between time and the emotion variables.