Excerpts

Finally, there was a marginally significant interaction between Day and Word Type, F (1, 20) = 3.904, MSE = 3608.304, p = 0.062.

In the eastern region, where digital and financial infrastructure is already mature, DIF’s overall effect on URI is positive but only marginally significant ( β = 0.0189 , p = 0.062).

Another SNP, rs2043534 in NPAS2 , had marginal significance (p-value = 0.062).

Meanwhile, after further adjustment, stent thrombosis was associated with low BMI (BMI < 22 kg/m 2 ), comparing to the high BMI group (BMI ≥ 26 kg/m 2 ) at 12 month, that reached marginal significance (stent thrombosis, aHR 2.891 [0.949–8.812], P = 0.062 at 12 month, S2 Table ).

The correlation between platelets CoQ 10-TOTAL and noncoupled Complex I-linked oxygen consumption after addition of substrate glutamate (4G) was marginally significant in both control group (p = 0.062) and RA_ALL patients (p = 0.060), ( Fig 4D ).

The addition of a quadratic e-mail views term was almost significant B = 0.43 (95% CI: −0.02 to 0.87), p = .062, ΔR 2 = .005.

Differences in HIF-1α expression between BRCA1 and BRCA2 and non- BRCA mutation related DCIS were borderline significant (p = 0.062).

STK11 and PTEN mutations in non-smokers were lower than in smokers, but the difference was of marginal significance [2.1% (1/48) and 6.3% (7/112) vs. 13.2% (7/53) and 13.0% (14/108), X 2 = 4.274 and 2.87, P = 0.062 and 0.09, respectively].

The predicted interaction between the name prime manipulation and participant political identity on opinions of the president was marginally significant, F (2, 329) = 2.80, p = .062, partial eta-squared = .017.

In subgroup analyses, Beijing strains only had a significant association with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (aOR 6.1; 1.2–30.4), and an association of borderline significance with polyresistant tuberculosis (aOR 1.8; 1.0–3.5; p = 0.062), among individuals born in the Western Pacific.

The interaction just failed significance (F[2,18] = 3.257, p = .062).

Average offers rise slightly from Part 1 to Part 2 in the baseline and fall slightly in the other two treatments, though these differences are either insignificant or marginally significant (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, matching-group-level data, p ≈ 0.062 in the baseline; p ≈ 0.078 in the KA treatment, p > 0.20 in the UA treatment).

A statistically significant difference was found between admitted doping users and non-users in explicit attitude (p<.001) and social projection of doping use (p = .024), with a borderline significance for pressure to use doping (p = .062).

Stressful effect of fieldwork has a nearly significant relationship (p = 0.062), but only category “mild” vs. no stress at all.

The annual prevalence of CL were associated with annual average concentrations of PM 10 with borderline significance (P = 0.0621).

When we quantified this, we found a statistically marginally non-significant trend (p = 0.0622) towards increased endoneural IL-17+ cells in sural nerve biopsy tissue from CIDP patients compared to non-CIDP controls ( Fig 4B , S3 Table ).

A positive trend was observed in patients with critical illness and when samples were obtained >14 days after symptom onset [p = 0.0625].

The Terli group had nearly significant lower serum lactate levels than the LR or Vaso groups at 60 mins (p = 0.0627) and 90 mins (p = 0.089).

A generalized linear model ((PSS)~(exercise)*(condition)) showed quasi-significant coefficients of the effect of exercise ( p = 0.0628) and that of the interaction between Exercise #8 and the on-beat condition ( p = 0.0745).

All exposures analysed significantly increased Saa3 levels compared to the vehicle control, with the exception of the 18 μg/mouse dose exposure to NM-400, which was only borderline significant (P = 0.0629).

Post hoc analyses indicated a significant difference between the REST and ANTI condition in the right hemisphere (p<0.05), whereas, the difference between HAND and ANTI just failed to reach significance (p = 0.063).

The main effect of sleep group was approaching significance, F (1, 70) = 3.572, p = .063, η p 2 = .049, with greater mean improvement for the sleep-first condition (M = .054, SE = .020) than the wake-first condition (M = .004, SE = .018) indicating that sleep soon after first exposure to the stimuli resulted in better overall performance.

The MANOVA revealed a marginally significant trend for a resource level * fish density interaction on chlorophyll- a (F 4,27 = 2.537, p = 0.063).

Pairwise comparisons evidenced a decrease between baseline and week 4 of therapy at the limit of significance (p = 0.063) and a statistically significant decrease between baseline and week 8 of therapy (p = 0.023).

We observed an overall trend for preferring the Hollow stimulus (Mann-Whitney test: V = 27016.5, df = 1, p = 0.063), that turned out highly significant when considering only the chicks never exposed to filled stimuli, namely chicks imprinted on the Occluded and Hollow objects (Mann-Whitney test: V = 10721.5, df = 1, p = 0.009), see Fig 4B .