Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

In logistic regression analysis, years in the profession were close to being statistically significant, where more than ten years in the profession indicated an increased probability of disagreeing with the statement (cOR 1.42; CI 0.98–2.07; n = 690; p = 0.064).
marginally significantp = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Comparing the two pulse-timings showed a marginally significant main effect of pulse timing ( F (1,7) = 4.820; p = 0.064) indicating that applying TMS pulses early, directly at the offset of the stimulus display, resulted in larger recall errors (24.23° on average) than TMS applied midway through the retention interval (23.4° on average) Audible ‘clicks’ from a TMS machine can have differential attentional cuing effects when presented at different time points [ 44 ], and thus have the potential to influence behavior differently early versus late during a memory delay.
near-significantp = .0641.3× alphagold
The analysis of Time-on-task in a 2*2*2*2 repeated measures ANOVA revealed no interaction between Contingency and Time-on-task (F(1, 82) = .014, p = .907, η p 2 < .001), a near-significant interaction between Contingency, Congruency, and Time-on-task (F(1, 82) = 3.516, p = .064, η p 2 = .041), and no interaction between Contingency, Congruency, Time-on-task, and Experiment (F(1, 82) = .032, p = .859, η p 2 < .001).
Interestingly, model 6 at T8 (not shown) excluded TME-Back and replaced it with TME-Abdominals and BMI, but these two variables just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.064 and 0.065, respectively).
marginal significancep = 0.0641.3× alphagold
n [HR: 1.999, 95% CI: 1.622–2.646, p < 0.001], poor performance status [HR: 1.463, 95% CI: 1.221–1.751, p < 0.001], and ALBI grade 2 [HR: 1.531, 95% CI: 1.285–2.823, p < 0.001] were independent predictors associated with a decreased survival; ALBI grade 3 was associated with a decreased survival at marginal significance [HR: 1.525, 95% CI: 0.967–2.38, p = 0.064] in the Cox model.