Excerpts

This difference became marginally significant ( P = 0.064) after setting the f AFLP -values with low confidence to “0” (i.e. in 13 out of 20 cases the estimates did not significantly differ from 0).

Furthermore, we found that for strict-endorsers there was a significant effect of condition, F (1, 449) = 4.53, p = .034, η p 2 = .01 and for nurturant-endorsers there was a marginally significant effect of condition, F (1, 449) = 3.44, p = .064, η p 2 = .01.

The overall regression model on RMETNeut was only marginally significant and accounted for 10% of the variance (F(7,119) = 1.98; p = 0.064).

10 ) showed a marginally significant ( F = 12.46; P = 0.0640, species-environment relation variance explained by axis 1∶78.6%; and cumulatively by axis 1 and 2∶89.5%) association of adventive species with strawberry guava (clusters A and B, right quadrants of RDA ordination).

There was no difference in odds for children whose mothers hadn’t completed high school and those who continued beyond, though the association approached significance (p = 0.064).

In adults with and without ADHD however, this CDA amplitude enhancement was only marginally significant (Trial-type effect: F(1,31) = 3.7; P = .064).

Two other occupational groups differed with borderline significance: housewives (E = 11.5 > R = 1.8, p = 0.064) and government employees (E = 2.0 < R = 4.4, p = 0.071) and in all occupational categories residents had more prevalence HIV than entrants.

Although there was a clear trend for ER status serving as a favorable prognostic factor for OS by univariate analysis in BCMEW, the analysis did not show statistical significance (P = 0.064).

Cell line 1771 (B-cell lymphoma) showed a trend toward overrepresentation in the bottom quartiles (adj. p = 0.064).

Nevertheless, marginal significance (p = 0.0641) was observed for FDiv between the 1990s and 2010s for locomotion function ( Fig 3C ).

1B ; Student’s t-test, p = 0.0642, marginal significance).

One-way ANOVA showed a trend towards a main effect of treatment group on IL-6 release ( F (3,8) = 3.632, p = 0.0642) but not IL-10 ( F (3,16) = 0.6086, p = 0.619) or BDNF ( F (3, 8) = 0.142, p = 0.932) ( Fig. 4 ).

The same ANOVA performed on the false alarm rates showed a trend towards a group difference [F(1.32) = 1.99, p = 0.0645].

By adding 15 old adults to the older adults group, this effect is now only marginally significant (t(347) = 2.249; p = 0.0646).

Analysis of severe depression cases (HAM-D>24) showed a trend for correlation between baseline BDNF levels and HAM-D scores ( Fig 1B ; p = 0.0646, n = 43).

ILO reduced lung epithelial injury by 40% as measured by BAL RAGE ( Fig 2B ) and showed a trend towards reduced damage to the alveolar-capillary barrier by 34% ( Fig 2C , p = 0.0648).

Mice treated topically with vitamin E, however, exhibited an increase in tumor growth rate compared to mice treated with vehicle, 16.6% increase in tumor burden per week versus 11.1%, respectively, which approached significance ( p = 0.0649, Figure 1C ).

The interaction of stocking method x month was marginally significant (P = 0.065) for CP in 2014.

We observed that for the FF samples, C t was significantly reduced with increased time of exposure to room temperature for GAPDH (p = 0.036; Table 5 ) with a trend toward significance for ACTB (p = 0.065).

However, only the MCA of the retropalatal airway showed significant difference ( P = 0.038) between the case and control group and the MCA of the retroglossal airway almost reached statistical significance (p = 0.065) ( Table 3 ).

This was partially confirmed by the existence of a negative but marginally significant relationship between individual body size and the mean predicted dietary contribution of pigeons (Spearman correlation, r = −0.60, P = 0.065, n = 14).

The decrease in IFN-γ production between these two groups approached significance (p = 0.065).

The general linear model of the improvement in fluency was marginally significant, F (5, 84) = 2.17, p = .065, η p 2 = .114, power = .72.

As suggested by the simple correlation reported above, the mixed effects model also demonstrated that pup numbers increased with date (LME estimate: 0.86, t = 34.01, p < 0.0001) and in addition there was a weak trend towards higher numbers being counted at high tide (LME estimate: 2.50, t = 1.52, p = 0.065), most likely because pups are more difficult to detect along wide rocky tidal shores.

In the analysis separating by sex, similar to what we observed for Trust, a marginally significant relationship is again observed only in the male subjects (OT: p<0.065; OT quadratic: p<0.065), but not in female subjects (OT: p<0.210; OT quadratic: p<0.240).