Consistent with these findings dsAaMC1-injected mosquitoes had a significantly higher median number of oocysts when infected with Plasmodium gallinaceum ( P <0.007, Mann-Whitney Test)( Figure S2 ); the difference in the oocyst distributions was marginally significant ( P <0.07, KS Test) and the prevalence of infection increased significantly from 63% to 80% ( P <0.008, Chi-square Test).
Excerpts
Conversely, when compared with blood type O, individuals with blood type A had a statistically borderline significant higher risk of stomach cancer (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.98–1.48, P = 0.070) and colorectal cancer (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.97–1.43, P = 0.097) ( Table 3 ).
showed a trendp = .07
Paired samples t-tests showed that controls had greater alpha power in the right compared to the left hemisphere (t 20 = 2.45, p = .024 ), whereas patients showed a trend for greater alpha power in the left vs. right hemisphere (t 20 = −1.9, p = .07) ( Figure 2C , left panel).
Upon further consideration of confounders in Mode 3, 1–2 cups/day of total coffee or caffeinated coffee was still associated with a lower risk of constipation although it is marginally significant for total coffee (total coffee: OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35–1.06, p = 0.07); caffeinated coffee: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35–0.95, p = 0.03).
showed a trendp = 0.07
A 4 x 2 repeated measures ANOVA on the percentage of misses, with condition (P+A+, P+A-, P-A+, P-A-) and version (implicit, explicit) as factors, showed a trend toward a significant effect of condition (F(3, 81) = 2.67, p = 0.07; Greenhouse-Geisser corrected).
borderline significancep = 0.07
For the HGSNAT p.R384X allele, a clear increase was also observed, with borderline significance (p = 0.07) ( Fig 4D ).
We built the aforementioned models stratified by gender based on the marginally significant interaction between gender and weight perception pattern in our sample (p = 0.07), and further performed subgroup analysis across BMI category (normal and obese).
For the comparison of response conflict (RI-SI), the difference was marginally significant among the four blocks, F (3,150) = 2.11, p = .07.
The repeated measures ANOVA showed that SAR did not affect soil pH value in the PF ( p = 0.997), but it significantly reduced soil pH value in the BF ( p = 0.01) and the reduction was marginally significant in the MF ( p = 0.07).
No main effect of task was significant but Figs 3 – 6 and post-hoc Newman-Keuls analyses showed that 1) the participants exhibited significantly lower CoP displacement in the searching dynamic task than in the free-viewing dynamic task (post-how Newman-Keuls analyses were significant for R ML , V ML , V AP ( p <0.032) and almost significant for SD ML ( p = 0.07) and that 2) the participants did not exhibit any significant difference in CoP displacement between the searching static and free-viewing static tasks ( ns ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.07
A trend towards significance was noted for overall weight [Mean IQR: 78.6 (48.2–109.0) vs. 76.0 (74.3–77.8) kg, p = 0.07], and for those with a waist circumference ≥88 cm (adjusted OR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.0–2.0, p = 0.08).
While the levels of arginine were unchanged, MMA and ADMA were significantly reduced (p< 0.01 and p< 0.05, respectively) and SDMA reduction almost reached statistical significance (p = 0.07) with HFHC diet ( Fig 3E ).
A tendency towards an interaction effect was observed for time-to-respiratory compensation point (RCP) (P = 0.05), with post hoc analysis showing an increasing trend in the I-HAES ® group (P = 0.07); delta analysis revealed greater increases in the I-HAES ® group compared that in the CTRL group (P = 0.05).
The group difference was marginally significant when expressing happiness, t (38) = 1.90, p < .07.
For two levels, the gender difference was marginally significant in the lower level (p = 0.07), but not significant in the upper level.
of borderline significanceP = 0.07
The atazanavir C 12 was higher (median, 0.85 mg/L; range, 0.11–1.75) in patients with incident stones compared with patients without stones (median, 0.66 mg/L; range, 0.01–5.84), but the difference was of borderline significance ( P = 0.07).
3A ), we found a significant main effect of factors verb [F(1,17) = 39.72, p<0.001] and SOA [F(1,17) = 984.64, p<0.001], while the factor arm was very close to being significant [F(1,17) = 3.53, p = 0.07].
Post-hoc comparisons achieved an almost significant effect (p = 0.07) of the drug in the time spent by animals in exploring the light compartment, when compared to vehicle administered animals.
showed a trendp = 0.07
BRAF mut/MSS cancers showed a trend for increasing rates of CIN coinciding with spread to at least one lymph node (p = 0.07).
However, these increases were only marginally significant (p = 0.070).
Veterans decreased in perceived structure from the military to their first civilian job ( p = 0.03) whereas civilian students non-significantly increased in their perceived structure from their education to their first post-graduation job ( p = 0.29), resulting in a marginally significant veteran status by context interaction, F (1, 178) = 3.27, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.01 (see Study 1 Supplemental Analysis in supplemental materials for full results).
In the case of cmetS-Z, however, a marginally significant relationship with fitness was only found in girls ( p = 0.07).
Only the interaction between GI and age for men was borderline significant (p = 0.07).
Crucially, this analysis revealed that, overall, the stress group showed marginally greater learning of probability-based information than the control group (as indicated by the marginally significant GROUP × PROBABILITY interaction, F (1, 51) = 3.45, p = .07, η 2 p = .06; stress group: M random high = 96.34%, M random low = 101.61%, standardized learning score: M = 5.27%; control group: M random high = 97.04%, M random low = 100.89%, standardized learning score: M = 3.85%, see Fig 4 ; for a figure with individual data points, see S5 Fig in S1 File ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.07
The mean response times for the two frames of reference showed a trend towards significance ( t (27) = −1.87, p = 0.07): Response times were marginally faster for the relative frame of reference (854 ms) than for the intrinsic frame of reference (886 ms).