Excerpts

Time periods 2500ms and 4000ms produced similar differences and approached significance ( p < .1) (see Fig 7C ).

For folate in Mozambique, the change was also substantial (28%) and marginally significant (p<0.1, Table 2 ).

For the Avicularia/Laciniata lineage marginally significant ( p -value <0.1) results were obtained for linear axes slightly south of due east and between ∼230° to 270° ( Fig. 1e ).

the ECIC and CNIC) failed to reach statistical significance ( Figure 8 ), we found no evidence for group-wise regional differences within the inferior colliculus: Tests for both the ECIC and CNIC regions reached marginal significance (for each region, F [2,17] >2.73; P<0.10), and showed a similar between-group pattern of manganese uptake ( Figure 8 i.e. control<salicylate; noise≈salicylate).

This difference approached significance with the conservative, 2-tailed Fisher's Exact test, p = .10.

Different suicidal ideation rates were assessed by a multivariate logistic regression model using the variables that were at least marginally significant, with p<0.10 in the univariate analysis, and other significant factors according to previously published studies.

For children up to 10 years, IgG OD responses increased significantly (p<0.05) with age for spike, while IgA OD responses to spike and RBD presented a marginally significant (p<0.1) increase with age ( Fig 2F ).

Also there were a trend toward significance for whole brain skeleton FD values between ALS-CST+ and both ALS-CST– (p = 0.10) and ALS-Cl patients (p = 0.10).

By contrast, a nearly significant (p = 0.10) reduction in rCBF (↓19%) was present in EMF-treated Tg mice during their ON period vs.

Furthermore, we found a statistical trend for a difference in perceived social bonding between 7-repeat carriers and non-carriers within the alcohol condition at this alcohol dose ( p = .10) such that, as expected, carriers of the 7-repeat reported increased perceived social bonding compared to 7-absent individuals.

Light green indicates approaching significance (0.05≤p≤0.1) between the groups shown, indicating a ratio <1.

Mutual adjustment were then applied including all significant or nearly significant factors (p<0.1) with additional adjustment for gender, age and current smoking.

In contrast, analysis of each individual het-c allele class resulted in a significant negative D score for het-c2 and het-c3 (P-value<0.05, all P-values for Tajima's D scores calculated using assumed beta distribution [50] ) and a borderline significant (P-value<0.1) score for het-c1 , suggesting that each het-c allele class is also under directional selection.

When the ANOVAs were at least marginally significant (p<0.1), we ran TukeyHSD tests for more detail on the effect analysed.

Any significant or marginally significant ( P <0.1) factors or interactions between factors were retained, and included in a new minimum adequate model.

Factors that were significant and nearly significant (P<0.1) were included in univariate analysis.

A two-sided t -test indicated that the difference between these two means was marginally significant ( t 4341 = 1.29; p = .10).

Marginally significant variables with p<0.10 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.

Multiple logistic regression (using automated backward variable selection) was performed including those clinical parameters that showed at least a trend towards significance in univariate analysis (cut-off p-value = 0.1) using SPSS 15.0.

The KM plots were used to re-evaluate all of the previously tested binomials and polynomials demonstrating significant (p < .05) or borderline significant results (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

For all statistical tests, we considered differences to be significant at P ≤0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05< P ≤0.10.

However, comparisons of ΔAIC and R 2 indicated that the simpler MAM containing a linear size effect had substantially greater support than the MAM including a marginally significant non-linear response of basal area growth with tree size (DBH 2 : L = 2.71, P = 0.10; ΔAIC for the MAM with a non-linear size effect was only 0.7 points lower than for the model with a linear size effect; Table 2 ).

All three CD specific paediatric polymorphisms on PSMG1 and TNFRSF6B showed a trend of association with p<0.1.

When we regressed GPA on the three future self-identification components, the overall regression model was marginally significant, F (3, 520) = 2.08, p = .10, R 2 = .01.

All tests were two-tailed with the significance level set at p ≤.05 and the level of borderline significance set at p ≤.10.