Excerpts

Asia, Latin-America & the Caribbean and Eastern Europe & Central Asia) with two more marginally significant (e.g. sub-Saharan Africa, High-Income; p<0.10).

Pathogens, and negative and approaching significance (P ≤ 0.1) with resistance to Bovine herpes virus 1 and Trichophyton pathogens.

Because of the small sample size in this pilot study, we also report marginally significant results (p < .10), and are careful to interpret these results with caution.

There were no significant positive correlations between birthweight and resistance, although that with Myiasis approached significance (P ≤ 0.1).

Four independent variables, namely GDPG, INFL, CO 2 , and URB, have highly significantly (p ≤ 0.01) influenced FDI, while UNEMP had a positive and somewhat significant influence (p ≤ 0.1) on the dependent variable in the long run.

In contrast, analysis of each individual het-c allele class resulted in a significant negative D score for het-c2 and het-c3 (P-value<0.05, all P-values for Tajima's D scores calculated using assumed beta distribution [50] ) and a borderline significant (P-value<0.1) score for het-c1 , suggesting that each het-c allele class is also under directional selection.

One factor demonstrated a statistical trend (0.05< P <0.10): chronic kidney disease (yes vs. no; P = 0.081).

However, at 0.15–0.3-m depth the correlation with the sum of silt and clay content was only marginally significant (P = 0.1).

Next, significant variables or with marginal significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.100) were selected for multivariate analysis, trying to group those that were similar.

Bivariate analysis focused on identifying covariates that showed at least a marginally significant (p-value ≤ 0.10) association with SEQ-12 score.

Moreover, although the main effect for SVO in the analysis of Security was marginally significant ( p = .10), the mean differences were in the opposite direction to the mean differences in the analysis of Conformity.

The interaction between SLM training and gender is also positive and marginally significant (β = 0.0.315, p < 0.1 ).

All variables significantly associated with general cognitive scores in the bivariate models (p<0.2) were included in the multivariate model, and only retained if they had an at least marginally significant association (p<0.1) or modified the coefficient by at least 5% [32] , [33] , [38] .

Second, the accuracy scores appeared to be slightly better for reference number 16 than for reference number 32, as indicated by the marginally significant Wilcoxon Tests in the math group, z = −1.33, p = .1 (Reference Number 16 Mdn = .84, SD = .05; Reference Number 32 Mdn = .83, SD = .06), and in the control group, z = −1.76, p = .07 (Reference Number 16 Mdn = .83, SD = .06; Reference Number 32 Mdn = .84, SD = .05).

Results based on OLS tended to show negative associations between water-stable aggregates and measures of plant biomass while results based on GLS found a mixture of no appreciable associations, marginally significant (0.05 < P ≤ 0.10), and significant (α = 0.05) negative associations between water-stable aggregates and plant properties.

When the ANOVAs were at least marginally significant (p<0.1), we ran TukeyHSD tests for more detail on the effect analysed.

OVA challenge in control-treated mice induced typical AHR, while mice that had received a Pam3Cys treatment at the first two OVA inhalation challenges showed a trend towards a reduced AHR (p = 0.10) ( Figure 2a for the 20 μg/mouse dose of Pam3Cys).

β = 0.62, p = 0.003) and showed a trend towards significance in the separate study groups (ADPKD: St. β = 0.51, p = 0.1 and IgAN control: St. β = 0.76, p = 0.054).

Significance was set at **p<0.05, and results that approached significance *p<0.1 were also noted.

Sensitivity analyses Calculating PDC for the LDC cohort based on the mean PDC of both substances decreased the effect size of the ATT compared to the original definition, but the results point into the same direction in all years and remained highly significant in years 2 and three (0.02, p>0.10; 0.08, p = 0.006; 0.12, p<0.001).

Initially univariate logistic regressions were analysed to identify any significant or marginally significant relationships (using p<.10 as the inclusion criterion).

Positive immune responses to CDV HA were observed in 4 of 9 vaccinated dogs; a positive IFN-γ immune response to autologous tumor antigen was also observed in 1 dog and a trend towards significance (p<0.1) was observed in another 2 dogs.

In a comparison of all three TOP/culture categories from Table 1 , multivariate results revealed that age (p = 0.02) and gender (p<0.001) were statistically significant and previous TB treatment was marginally significant (p = 0.10).

P values indicated on figures are for the significant (P<0.05) or near-significant (0.05<P<0.1) factor that has been plotted.

Flowering plants were influenced by management and had more species in grazed patches than in non-managed patches ( Fig 3 A ), although the difference was marginally non-significant (Tukey test, p < 0.1).