Excerpts

Simple effects analyses indicated that Emoji Condition was significant for opinions, F (2, 658.38) = 8.27, and request refusals, F (2, 653.96) = 8.95 and marginally significant for disclosures, F (2, 731.30) = 2.32, p < .10.

As this was a pioneering study exploring a poorly understood phenomenon, we aspired to detect any effect of human emotional odors on horses’ behavior and physiology and also considered marginally significant results, with a criterion of p-values ≤ 0.1.

Follow up tests within the Commander mission showed that the difference between Military and Firefighter groups was only marginally significant ( p < 0.10), but that both Military and Firefighter groups differed significantly from the Surveillance group, t (114) = 6.07, p < 0.01, and t (114) = 8.37, p < 0.01, respectively.

When analysis of variance (ANOVA) detected effects above borderline significance ( p < .10), post hoc power analyses were performed using the simr package [ 73 ], and a 95% confidence interval was reported (number of simulations: 1000).

(OR = 6.17, P<0.05) In addition, the odds of misclassification increased by 1.04 times for each one-year increase in mothers’ age, but this was only marginally significant (p<0.10).

Second, the accuracy scores appeared to be slightly better for reference number 16 than for reference number 32, as indicated by the marginally significant Wilcoxon Tests in the math group, z = −1.33, p = .1 (Reference Number 16 Mdn = .84, SD = .05; Reference Number 32 Mdn = .83, SD = .06), and in the control group, z = −1.76, p = .07 (Reference Number 16 Mdn = .83, SD = .06; Reference Number 32 Mdn = .84, SD = .05).

Following permutation testing, significance was observed for 2–5 locus haplotypes (p<0.05) and approached significance for the 7 and 8 locus haplotypes (permutation test p<0.1).

For the perception that respondents are being supported by older relatives, CG was marginally significant only for Future generations ( p < 0.1).

However, for lesions at brain level C, we observed a significant relationship with seizures (ANOVA; p = 0.002; strain CC002, p = 0.07) and limb clasping in CC057 mice (p = 0.01), plus near-significant associations with progression scores for paresis (ANOVA; p = 0.10) and encephalitis (strain CC057, p = 0.07).

Four independent variables, namely GDPG, INFL, CO 2 , and URB, have highly significantly (p ≤ 0.01) influenced FDI, while UNEMP had a positive and somewhat significant influence (p ≤ 0.1) on the dependent variable in the long run.

NADPH-d activity (expressed as arbitrary units of optical density) was decreased in the collecting ducts of the diabetic rats present in the outer stripe of the outer medulla and in the thick ascending limb of Henle’s loop present in the inner stripe of the outer medulla, whereas in the collecting ducts of the inner stripe of the outer medulla NADPH-d activity showed a trend (p<0.1) to decrease.

In addition, subjects walked with significantly greater step width variability (F (1,85) = 19.12, η 2 = 0.18, p <0.01) and showed a trend of walking with greater step time variability (F (1,85) = 2.81, p = 0.10) during POST than during PRE.

Changes in two other genes approached significance (>0.05 to p<0.1), 14-3-3 epsilon at two ages, P7+1d and P7+7d and FABP7 at P7+1d.

Results and analysis Effect of dietary concentrate/crude ratio on yak growth performance As shown in Table 2 , final body weight exhibited an increasing trend with higher concentrate feed inclusion ( P > 0.10).

Body Function Outcomes: Commercial Games For CG studies only (3 studies, 58 total participants, see Figure 3 ), the overall effect size was G = 0.76, 95% CI = [−0.17, 1.70], which approached significance, Z obs = 1.60, P = 0.10.

7 experimental days or 7 meal components), marginal significance ( P <0.1) is also indicated so the reader will be able to reach own conclusions about these results.

Third, we find the fewest statistically significant relationships between HIV/AIDS outcomes and the likelihood of COVID infection, and most of the very few associations are marginally significant (p<0.10).

Because of the small sample size in this pilot study, we also report marginally significant results (p < .10), and are careful to interpret these results with caution.

All three CD specific paediatric polymorphisms on PSMG1 and TNFRSF6B showed a trend of association with p<0.1.

2, right panel ), there was a significant main effect of dose (F = 6.97, p<0.05), but the treatment and interaction effect only approached significance (p<0.1).

Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05 and marginally significant if P < 0.10.

However, at 0.15–0.3-m depth the correlation with the sum of silt and clay content was only marginally significant (P = 0.1).

Owing the limited power of certain analyses, which are based on small sample sizes, we also report ‘marginally significant’ values (0.05< p <0.10) and interpret them to indicative inconclusive results (i.e., we can neither reject nor accept the null hypothesis).

In a comparison of all three TOP/culture categories from Table 1 , multivariate results revealed that age (p = 0.02) and gender (p<0.001) were statistically significant and previous TB treatment was marginally significant (p = 0.10).

In 2009, there was a significant (P<0.05) sampling date by grass species interaction with respect to bean tissue Fe and Mn concentration, and a marginally significant (P = 0.10) date by grass species interaction with respect to tissue Zn concentration, thus data for these nutrients were analysed separately at each sampling stage.