Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

For instance, retinal vasomotor function is, as part of the cerebral circulation, largely dependent on local nitric oxide (NO) production.[ 31 , 32 ] Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous NO synthase inhibitor, is a known independent cardiovascular risk factor and has been shown to influence arteriolar and venule diameter.[ 33 ] A comparison of obese and moderately-trained subjects as well as athletes showed a trend to lower ADMA in individuals with higher physical fitness.[ 34 ] This observation may point towards an NO-mediated mechanism for fitness-dependent blood flow measurements in the FAZ area.
Changes in sap flow at different slope positions It is evident from Fig 4 that the daily variations in sap flow of Salix psammophila show similar trends at all slope positions, but the sap flow rates of the same slope position show slight variations because of the differences in branch diameters, with an overall trend of D3 > D2 > D1.
I have a few requests: 1) The authors should probably refrain from referring to "marginally significant" results as this is technically a violation of frequentist statistical approaches from most points of view, although this is an admittedly minor issue. 2) 2)More importantly, it would be useful for the authors to provide both confidence intervals on point estimates and effect size information.
Results The estimation results of ( Eq 1 ) for the three birth cohort groups (the older, middle and younger birth cohorts) summarized in Table 2 suggest a steepening of the SES-mortality gradient with an increase in the year of birth: There is no significant SES-mortality gradient for the older cohorts, a marginally significant gradient for the middle cohorts, and a significant and strong negative gradient for the younger cohorts.
In contrast, in the model comparing derivational to orthographic and semantic priming, the interaction between Set and Prime Type was significant for the comparison between morphological and orthographic priming ( b = 0.0443, SE = 0.0208, t = 2.139), while it was only marginally significant for the comparison between morphological and semantic priming ( b = 0.0393, SE = 0.0208, t = 1.891).