Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

Interestingly, we demonstrated that pretreatment of the NTS with the GABA A receptor selective agonist muscimol, rather than pretreatment of the NTS with the selective GABA A receptor selective antagonist bicuculline followed by chemical activation of the NTS with NMDA, decreased the severity of PTZ-induced seizures, in addition to completely significantly blocking postictal antinociception.
highly significantqualifiedgold
( 7 ) is converted to: 9 y = M 0 + M 1 x 1 + M 2 x 2 + M 3 x 3 + M 4 x 4 The regress () function in MATLAB are was used to calculate and process 16 groups of data, and the linear regression equation of the roughness prediction model was obtained 40 : 10 R a = 2.904 b 01 0.136 r 01 - 0.251 γ 0 - 0.061 α 0 - 0.102 Regression analysis and F test were performed on the roughness prediction model, F = 91.22 > F 0.05 (4,11) = 5.936, and the regression equation of the prediction model was highly significant at the level of α = 0.05, indicating that the surface roughness formula and experimental data fit each other with high reliability.
As of January 25, 2023, the number of positive nucleic acid tests and the positivity rate of the COVID-19 reporting population in each province of China showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing, with the number of positives reaching a peak on December 22, 2022 (6.94 million), after the nationwide cessation of nucleic acid screening for the whole population on December 8, 2022 1 .
highly significantqualifiedgold
Focusing on the five parents that had the best average DS scores and exhibited the strongest (and highly significant) GCA effects (Tables 2 and 3 ), the following conclusions could be drawn: Parents 18Nord-107 (GCA effect − 4.37**), ND Noreen (GCA-effect − 9.32**), and 19Nord-131 (GCA effect − 4.37**) were located closer to the origin on the Vr-Wr graph, suggesting that the three lines possess mostly dominant genes with increasing effect on resistance/susceptibility.
Pairwise t-tests for cue validity and temporal distribution showed a significantly higher BIS score for the Certain Valid than the Neutral, p = 0.0001, for the Narrow Valid than the Neutral condition, p = 0.004, and a statistical trend for the Wide Valid than the Neutral, whereas no effect was found for the uniform condition.