Since Moran I was almost significant (Moran I = 0.06; Expected value = −0.01; p = 0.057), we ran two Generalized Least Square Models (GLS), one non-controlled for spatial autocorrelation (GLS nsp ) and one controlled for spatial autocorrelation (GLS sp ) 83 .
Excerpts
Additionally, Approach Motivation was also non-significant ( b = −0.02 [−0.07, 0.03], z = −0.84, p =.40), and Mood Disturbance was marginally significant ( b = 0.07 [−0.003, 0.14], z = 1.90, p =.057).
close to significanceP = 0.057
Other small non-coding RNAs included in the panel [i.e., RNU6, miR-143, miR-451 and miR-125 (close to significance, P = 0.057)] shows a constant expression throughout 2, 4 and 6 days after PHx and a trend of downr-egulation compared to the expression measured at day 0 (See Fig. 7 , lower row).
close to significancep = 0.057
Improvement in performance for voiced plosives differing by place of articulation was also close to significance (mean change in performance of 8.3%; SD: 11.4%; t (19) = 3.3, p = 0.057).
showed a trendP = 0.057
Also, the number of activated mast cells showed a trend towards an increase in LDLr −/− /RP105 −/− mice compared to control ( Fig. 6d ; P = 0.057).
borderline significanceP = 0.057
Furthermore, high expression of ITGB1 was correlated with late clinical stages in both cohorts ( P = 0.019, P = 0.016, respectively) and with lymph node metastasis but with borderline significance ( P = 0.057, P = 0.062, respectively).
approached significancep = 0.057
The test approached significance (χ 2 = 5.73, p = 0.057).
The model explained 12.03% of the total adjusted variance, showing a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.057).
marginally non-significantp = 0.057
However, oleic acid strongly induced pre-pupal removal (p = 0.0004) and marginally non-significant post-pupal removal (p = 0.057).
approached significancep =.057
Additionally, negative valence approached significance ( b = 0.001, SE = 0.001, t (4177) = 1.90, p =.057), suggesting a tendency toward reduced efficiency after negative compared to neutral primes.
just failed to reach significanceP = 0.057
However, it must be emphasized that in the repeated treatment group, statistical analysis just failed to reach significance (P = 0.057).
Furthermore, a statistical trend was found for skewnessglobal ( p = 0.057, higher values in participants with primary headache disorders).
borderline significancep = 0.057
In the ≥ 70-year subgroup, the protective effect of NHAPI race/ethnicity remained statistically significant ( p < 0.001), whereas the adverse effect associated with NHB race/ethnicity was of only borderline significance ( p = 0.057).
Interestingly, there was a marginally significant increase ( p = 0.057) in BeS excreted in 80-min samples between the decontamination interventions and controls.
These associations were attenuated to marginal significance in Model 2 (TG, P = 0.057; HDL-C, P = 0.079) and became non-significant in Model 3 (Table 2 ).
3b , most brain regions of the mentalizing network represent social congruency as revealed by r(same) being higher than r(diff), i.e., r(same) – r(diff) one sample t-test: PC marginally significant (p = 0.057; all p’s Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons, i.e., the number of ROIs), TPJ (p = 0.013) and posterior mPFC (p = 0.011) (see Fig. 3b ).
While this effect was robust and significant for visual stimuli in all DMN regions, it was only marginally significant in one region (left angular gyrus: t = 1.94, P = 0.057) for audio stimuli.
Since seven of our OS participants left our study before taking this (grapheme-personification) synaesthesia test, we repeated our analysis with the conservative assumption that all were non-synaesthetes and this still resulted in a strong trend for a higher prevalence of confirmed grapheme-personification synaesthesia for gender associations in the OS group compared to controls, χ 2 (1) = 3.618, p = 0.057, 95% CI [−0.004, 0.30].
These differences were consistent among parents of both savant and non-savant children with ASD except in the motivation domain where the gender difference in the savant group was only marginally significant ( P = 0.057, Cohen’s d = 0.069 ).
borderline significancep = 0.057
Only in the nasal sector the CON group had correlation with borderline significance ( p = 0.057).
There was a strong trend towards a difference between treatment groups from baseline to 4 weeks (f 1,24 = 3.99, p = 0.057) (see Fig. 4 , Table 4 ).
Although the effect of intra-articular injection approached the borderline of significance (p = 0.057), other variables including age, gender, follow-up period, presence of MOL, presence of disc displacement, pain, and noise did not significantly influence the prognosis of TMJ OA.
of borderline significanceP = 0.057
This inversely corresponded to a pronounced difference in osteoclast numbers/mm 2 : group 2 (WT mice with external fixator and concomitant M-CSF therapy) showed lower numbers of osteoclasts/mm 2 than WT mice in group 1 (external fixator without additional M-CSF therapy), this difference was found to be of borderline significance (P = 0.057).
However, this is only true when comparing the efficiency of difficult prey to other difficult prey (marginally significant Tukey HSD: p = 0.057).
Other results show that the control variables did not reach a significant level at the 95% confidence level, and the moderating effect of construal level on personal norms is marginally significant at the 95% confidence level (interaction term p = 0.057, R 2 = 0.213).