Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

As might be expected, patients with the most prolonged ocSSRT in the OFF phase showed a trend for the greatest improvements from OFF to ON, although this just failed to reach significance (correlation coefficient between OFF ocSSRT and change in ocSSRT was 0.378, p = 0.083).By contrast, there was no relationship between the OFF RT and the change in ocSSRT from OFF to ON (correlation coefficient 0.117, p = 0.61).
nearly significantp = 0.0831.7× alphagold
Moreover, in the blindfolded group, we found a nearly significant correlation between proprioceptive shift and the increase in illusion statement rating in congruent compared to incongruent conditions (ρ = 0.322, p = 0.083; see Supplementary Fig. 1b ); this relationship was not found in the control group (ρ = −0.283, p = 0.129).
an increasing trendp = 0.0831.7× alphagold
Muscle strength After the 8-week intervention, improvements in the strength of the knee extensor were found in the 808 nm group only (+ 2.16%, p < 0.001), while the strength of the extensor showed an increasing trend in the sham control group (+ 1.74%, p = 0.083) and no change in the 606 nm group (− 0.36%, p = 0.82), as shown in Fig. 3 .
a statistical trendP = 0.08321.7× alphagold
Two-way ANOVA on flow velocity revealed a significant main effect of Time (F (3.041, 45.62) = 2.892, P = 0.0448) and a statistical trend towards an effect of Treatment group (F (1, 15) = 3.444, P = 0.0832, reflecting a trend towards a sample with higher velocities before and after stroke in the RIPerC group).
marginally significantp = 0.0841.7× alphagold
There were marginally significant interactions between perceived Black and White solidarity for the warmth ( b = 0.05, s.e. = 0.03, p = 0.084) and trust ( b = 0.04, s.e. = 0.02, p = 0.079) outcomes which displayed a similar pattern of results (see Supplement, Sect. 9 for simple slope analyses of marginally significant interactions).
marginally significantp = 0.0841.7× alphagold
There was a marginally significant main effect of order ( F 1 , 148 = 3.036, p = 0.084 , η p 2 = 0.02), such that the participants experiencing the office before school (M = 135.73) had a lower sense of presence than those experiencing the school before office (M = 142.05), perhaps because a school shooting is more psychologically engaging.
marginally significantp = 0.0841.7× alphagold
4.380 μV; t (46) = −2.902, p = 0.006); the group difference was marginally significant for the T3-T6 pair, where the amusic group again displayed reduced P3b amplitude (1.002 μV vs. 1.908 μV; t (46) = −1.767, p = 0.084); but the group difference was not significant for the T1-T4 pair (1.355 μV vs. 1.624 μV).
a statistical trendp = 0.0851.7× alphagold
Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis of the respiratory bacterial profiles of the elephants revealed a statistical trend ( p = 0.085, PERMANOVA) toward sample type divergence, based on the deviation of inter-sample diversity of the TW and ETT samples ( p = 0.029, p adj = 0.087).