As might be expected, patients with the most prolonged ocSSRT in the OFF phase showed a trend for the greatest improvements from OFF to ON, although this just failed to reach significance (correlation coefficient between OFF ocSSRT and change in ocSSRT was 0.378, p = 0.083).By contrast, there was no relationship between the OFF RT and the change in ocSSRT from OFF to ON (correlation coefficient 0.117, p = 0.61).
Excerpts
trending toward significanceP = 0.083
The image that did not reach statistical significance was trending toward significance ( P = 0.083).
Moreover, in the blindfolded group, we found a nearly significant correlation between proprioceptive shift and the increase in illusion statement rating in congruent compared to incongruent conditions (ρ = 0.322, p = 0.083; see Supplementary Fig. 1b ); this relationship was not found in the control group (ρ = −0.283, p = 0.129).
Muscle strength After the 8-week intervention, improvements in the strength of the knee extensor were found in the 808 nm group only (+ 2.16%, p < 0.001), while the strength of the extensor showed an increasing trend in the sham control group (+ 1.74%, p = 0.083) and no change in the 606 nm group (− 0.36%, p = 0.82), as shown in Fig. 3 .
of borderline significanceP = 0.0831
Discussion MSI CRC was detected in 12% of CRC patients diagnosed during the period 2011–2012, however when stratified by ethnic groups, a higher frequency was found in black versus OEG patients although only of borderline significance (15% versus 8% respectively; P = 0.0831).
Two-way ANOVA on flow velocity revealed a significant main effect of Time (F (3.041, 45.62) = 2.892, P = 0.0448) and a statistical trend towards an effect of Treatment group (F (1, 15) = 3.444, P = 0.0832, reflecting a trend towards a sample with higher velocities before and after stroke in the RIPerC group).
borderline significancep = 0.0839
The final mean BCVA was different between subtype A (64.3 letters), B (59.8 letters), and C (48.7 letters), with borderline significance (p = 0.0839).
There were marginally significant interactions between perceived Black and White solidarity for the warmth ( b = 0.05, s.e. = 0.03, p = 0.084) and trust ( b = 0.04, s.e. = 0.02, p = 0.079) outcomes which displayed a similar pattern of results (see Supplement, Sect. 9 for simple slope analyses of marginally significant interactions).
Fluent Spanish speakers have significantly better nutritional status across all three measures ( Table 3 ), but a marginally significant interaction term suggests less weight gain at higher parities among more fluent Spanish speakers (β spanish*pace = −3.866, p = 0.084).
Within the physical trials in T1 there was no statistically significant change in toe clearance when comparing the first and third obstacle in the IG but approaching significance ( t (13) = 1.873, p = 0.084).
sIgA was significantly related with mental health and approaching significance for physical health ( B = −.20, p = 0.084).
There was a marginally significant main effect of order ( F 1 , 148 = 3.036, p = 0.084 , η p 2 = 0.02), such that the participants experiencing the office before school (M = 135.73) had a lower sense of presence than those experiencing the school before office (M = 142.05), perhaps because a school shooting is more psychologically engaging.
close to significancep = 0.084
The direct effect of aerobic exercise intensity, included as a moderator variable, was not statistically significant but was close to significance (B = − 0.411, p = 0.084), implying that aerobic exercise might have a potential influence on cognitive function.
approached significanceP = 0.084
However, the difference in CSS between the two groups only approached significance ( P = 0.084).
showed a trendp = 0.084
Within non-responders, the PAF at C4 showed a trend of negative correlation with observationally-induced hypoalgesia (r = −0.41, p = 0.084, Fig. 5c ).
a trend toward significancep = 0.084
HGF–RANTES showed a positive association in TgAD ( r = 0.690, p = 0.006), with an observed Z-change = 1.376 and a trend toward significance ( p = 0.084) relative to WT.
Enculturation with Iranian cultural traditions (CTQ-ir) did not correlate significantly with any of the emotion recognition scores (all p s > .084), although emotion recognition for joyful movements was trending towards significance ( p = .084, r = .158).
borderline significancep ≈ 0.084
Additionally, cognitive delay approached borderline significance ( p ≈ 0.084), implying a potential role that might reach significance with a larger sample size.
showed a trendp = 0.084
Ejection fraction and systolic volume showed a trend toward improvement (p = 0.084 and 0.091 respectively).
4.380 μV; t (46) = −2.902, p = 0.006); the group difference was marginally significant for the T3-T6 pair, where the amusic group again displayed reduced P3b amplitude (1.002 μV vs. 1.908 μV; t (46) = −1.767, p = 0.084); but the group difference was not significant for the T1-T4 pair (1.355 μV vs. 1.624 μV).
approached significancep = 0.0843
Among the model terms, the linear term of P ( p = 0.0711) approached significance, and the linear term of V ( p = 0.0843) also exhibited a certain influence trend; however, neither reached statistical significance at the 95% confidence level.
showed a trendP = 0.0845
2f ), while RIPK3 blockade showed a trend to reduce the macrophage infiltration (P = 0.0845, Fig. 2f ).
Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis of the respiratory bacterial profiles of the elephants revealed a statistical trend ( p = 0.085, PERMANOVA) toward sample type divergence, based on the deviation of inter-sample diversity of the TW and ETT samples ( p = 0.029, p adj = 0.087).
a trend towards significancep = 0.085
Beta diversity Beta diversity analyses revealed a trend towards significance for differences in diversity between the BALF, ETT and TW samples ( p = 0.085, PERMANOVA) (Fig. 4 a).
In Bins 2 and 3, the two-way interaction between group and viewing condition was significant, F (2, 56) = 3.29, 3.35, p = 0.005, 0.042, generalized eta 2 = 0.07, 0.06, respectively This interaction was marginally significant in Bin 1, F (2, 56) = 2.58, p = 0.085, generalized eta 2 = 0.04.