Excerpts

The increase in Denali winter accumulation is highly significant (p < 0.001) in both Denali ice cores based on comparison of the winter means from 1870–1900 and 1980–2010, and a non-parametric Thiel-Sen robust linear regression 22 .

Our primary model of interest (see “Model 1” in “ Statistical analyses ”) on the cooperation scores revealed a highly significant impact of SVO on cooperation (F (1,149) = 20.222, p < 0.001), a significant main effect of the inductions (F (2,149) = 3.785, p = 0.0.025), and a significant interaction between SVO and the inductions (F (2,149) = 5.482, p = 0.005) (the model estimates are plotted in Fig. 4 ).

Moreover, participants with asthma demonstrated a higher prevalence of COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis (COPD, Emphysema, ChB) (31.1%) than their counterparts without asthma (6.8%), with a highly significant p-value (p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

For all these five miRNAs, the linear correlation coefficient r was found to be higer than 0.9 and presented an slope with a highly significant deviation from zero (p ≤ 0.001).

A highly significant ( P < 0.001) increase in the LDH release is observed in groups treated with 10 μg/mL FU-HfO 2 and PEG-HfO 2 with a somewhat significant ( P < 0.01) increase in those treated with 10 μg/mL HfO 2 and 5 μg/mL PEG-HfO 2 .

Regarding the clinical utility of the proposed biomarker, it is important to note that while the differences between the HC and MCI groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001 ), the observed effect size (Cohen’s d = -0.2245) is relatively small.

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of treatment (F(3,32) = 645.12, p < 0.001) and a smaller but significant effect of timepoint (F(1,32) = 49.68, p < 0.001).

There is a highly significant positive correlation between MBC and organic P ( r = 0.918, p < 0.001), and a strong correlation between soluble C and organic P ( r = 0.905, p < 0.001).

cervicornis cover as a highly significant positive predictor of net carbonate production ( p ≤ 0.001).

Generally, we found an increasing trend concerning crude seropositivity with advancing age ( p < 0.001); however, differences were only significant when comparing the older age group 60–69 (5.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5–5.9%) to the younger age group 20–29 (2.6%; 95%-CI 1.8–3.5%) (Table 1 ).

1 A, there were no significant age differences across groups (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.507); however, sex differences were highly significant (Chi-squared tests, p < 0.001): while a majority of participants from the no tinnitus group were female (~ 57%), ~ 85% of those with chronic tinnitus were male (Fig. 1 B).

Mixed linear model analysis of these data showed that the hyperopic shift induced by red light was highly significant ( P < 0.001) while the refractive change under blue light was not significant ( P = 0.49).

Effect of marker segregation distortion on map construction Single locus analysis detected 5.9% of markers with highly significant (P ≤ 0.001) distortion, and 7.3% with significant (0.001 < P < 0.05) segregation distortion, giving a total of 98 markers with distortion from the expected Mendelian segregation (Table 1 ).

The effect of trap model was highly significant (χ 2 = 50.6, df = 3, P > 0.001), whereas population of origin (χ 2 = 4.02, df = 3, P = 0.26), sex (z = −1.616, P = 0.106) and aquaria identity (z = 0.34, p = 0.73) were not.

While CRP continued to function as a predictor, SII was incorporated into the model in the second step [OR 1.002 (95% CI 1.001–1.002)], SII was extremely significant [B = 0.002, SE = 0.000, Wald = 12.462, P < 0.001].

Convergent validity was also established, as all standardized factor loadings exceeded 0.80, were highly significant (t-values > 16.98, p < 0.001), and the average variance extracted values ranged from 0.68 to 0.76, all surpassing the 0.50 criterion.

As expected, a main effect of Emotion was highly significant ( F (5,316) = 62.74, p < 0.001, effect size, eta-squared η 2 = 0.54).

The differences were considered significant for *P < 0.05, and highly significant for **P < 0.01 and extremely significant for ***P < 0.001 28 .

Both, LBmal1 and LPer1/2 had highly significant reductions (~ 25%) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively; Fig. 5 a, b).

A highly significant association was detected between the presence of tylosin residues above MRL and isolation of tylosin resistant- S. typhimurium (P value = 0.001) from the same chicken samples.

Repeated measures ANOVA indicated highly significant effects of dose ( F 3,12 = 51.40, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.93), chemical ( F 5,20 = 12.41, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.76), and dose x chemical interaction ( F 15,60 = 26.13, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.87).

Strength A meta-analysis of the seventeen included studies showed a moderately significant effect of BFR on isokinetic strength compared to the Non-BFR group (n = 305, SMD = 1.03, 95% CI 0.77–1.28, Z = 7.97, p < 0.001, Fig. 3 ), with moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 42%, p = 0.03).

Results Evidence for maternal transfer of immunity was demonstrated by highly significant correlations for both LBV mFAVN reciprocal titre (ρ = 0.93, S = 50.676, p < 0.001) and NiV Luminex binding MFI (r = 0.88, t = 6.77, df = 14, p < 0.001) for 16 dam-pup pairs, in which the pups were suckling neonates (Fig. 1 ).

In the 7 DAI, a highly significant abundance of GA 12 was observed in the laser-irradiated seeds than control with a fold change of 0.13 (*** p < 0.001) and found consistently higher in the irradiated seeds with a fold change of 0.10,0.13 and 0.03 respectively (* p < 0.05) (Fig. 6 c) in 14–28 DAI.

ET) revealed a highly significant difference for the factor stimulation condition (ventral contact: F = 113.31, p < 0.001; dorsal contact: F = 62.58, p < 0.001), but no significant interaction between stimulation condition and disease.