Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

a positive trendp < 10 –160.0× alphagold
Figure 4 puts the predicted ratios in the context of the training ratios, and Table S8 of the Supporting Information quantifies their correlations, elucidating a variety of trends: (1) no_resampling shows a positive trend between the training and the predicted ratio (Pearson’s r 95% CI: [0.440, 0.496], p < 10 –16 ), but since the training and the test ratio are also positively correlated ( Figure 3 ), the latter could be the one driving the predicted ratio of positives; (2) resampling_after_clustering had a constant
highly significantP -value <10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This overlap is highly significant ( P -value <10 −16 , hypergeometric test where the intersection is 9000 between 700 000 conserved islands and 60 000 DHSs, assuming a total of 30 000 000 potential loci), consistent with the idea that sequence conservation at overlapping unannotated conserved island/DHS loci reflects the importance of regulatory factor binding to DNA.
highly significantp<1x10 16the decimal point is missing; read as 1e-16qualifiedgold
The overlap between our set of 2,407 genes and this set of 1,092 genes was highly significant (p<1x10 16 , Fisher’s exact test, S2B Fig ) and, since RNA-seq is typically more sensitive than microarray analysis [ 31 ], we proceeded with the larger gene set.