The robustness of the final model is supported by a McFadden’s pseudo R-squared value of 33% and a highly significant model fit (χ2 = 554.94, p < 0.001).
Excerpts
This difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Pearson’s correlation coefficient reveals a highly significant strong negative correlation between deployment and finishing time considering the past 25 years (r < −0.940, p < 0.001).
The Wilcoxon test indicates highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences in the individual parameter values of V max and Km between the tCRS groups.
The correlations between the different estimations were highly significant (r > 0.998; P < 0.001). 4.5.2.
LVM and LVMI showed a decreasing trend from T1 to T3, with LVM highest in T1 and lowest in T3, and LVMI declining from T1 to T3 (both p < 0.001).
Comparing the mean anxiety scores between the components, Friedman Test revealed highly significant (chi sq = 823.5, p < 0.001) difference among the scores of various anxiety components.
There was a significant trend of increased frequency of adverse outcomes (MV, ICU admission, 30-day mortality) over higher degree of liver lesion ( p < 0.001 for overall difference and p < 0.001 for trend for all outcomes, Figure 2 ).
Living donor type exhibited a highly significant ( p < 0.001) positive impact on the time to graft failure.
Results Quantification of the tight junction protein ZO ‐1 within the cortex and cerebellum of the mouse cohort showed a significant trend to both increased number (cortex P < 0.001, cerebellum P < 0.001) and length (cortex P < 0.001, cerebellum P < 0.001) of junctional breaks associated with increasing age.
The chi-squared test revealed highly significant differences between the distribution of the BMI categories of the girls and boys ( p < 0.001; Cramer’s V = 0.135).
For all possible groups formed by combinations of five such blocks (53130) a number of strong (|r| > 0.5) and highly significant (p < 0.001) correlations was calculated.
The prevalence of these infectious etiologies differed significantly across the groups, showing an increasing trend from the lowest to the highest quartiles (pneumonia: increasing from 38.95% in Q1 to 52.98% in Q4; sepsis: from 33.40% in Q1 to 46.91% in Q4, P<0.001).
As compared with the control ( Figure 3C ), both the unheated and the heated selenium nanoparticles caused a highly significant (all P < 0.001) massive increase in hepatic glutathione peroxidase activity, by 38.8-fold and 34.2-fold, respectively.
This latter element shows a highly significant correlation with having high popularity (r = 0.325, p < 0.001).
Since the p -value is highly significant ( p = 0.001), we can conclude that there are indeed significant differences in fungal communities between the three sites.
Results: Highly significant increase was found in cathepsin L expression in AD and LP patients compared to controls [ P = 0.001].
After 25 min of incubation, samples at concentrations of 0.01 ng/μL, 0.1 ng/μL, 1 ng/μL, and 10 ng/μL showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) compared to the control group (CK), while no significant difference was observed for the 0.001 ng/μL samples ( Figure 4 b).
Specifically, the estimated values of the intercept (b1) and the quadratic term of UOT (b3) were − 0.28 and − 0.00, respectively, both showing highly significant effects ( p < 0.001; Table 1 ).
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the quantitative achene variables among the species were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
In group B, out of 15 patients, 12 patients had attained normal skin color, which was statistically highly significant at the level of P < 0.001, also one patient had mild improvement and two patients have moderate improvement.
This reduction was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.001).
Spider Sizes All non-parametric correlations between proxies for spider body size were highly significant and positive: pre- and post-experiment average body mass (rho = 0.95, p < 0.001) post-experiment body mass and web size (rho = 0.93, p < 0.001), post-experiment body mass and body length (rho = 0.98, p < 0.001), and body length and web size (rho = 0.86, p < 0.001).
In this line, the contractile response to PE was tested and both compounds significantly reduced the contractile response to PE, although oxime–1 showed a more highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction of the contractile response to different concentrations of PE (10 −7 to 10 −5 M).
Results: The regression model showed an adjusted R 2 of 33.5% with an estimated standard error of 5.75% and was highly significant ( p < 0.001).