Excerpts

Pairwise comparisons between groups with differing glycemic control using Dunn’s test revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences for all categories save between the diabetic and poorly-controlled groups, which were not significant.

On the basis of the number of participants in the two groups who moved from offender to non-offender status during the follow-up period, the highly significant effect of treatment ( P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test) is 0.32 to 0.49 (Cramer, a medium to large effect).

There was a highly significant (p < 0.001) interactive effect of age with grand-maternal diet on telomere length at 6 months of age, strongly suggesting accelerated ageing of the ovarian tissue in the recuperated group.

In all strength-related rANCOVA models (bench press 1RM and squat 1RM), the baseline values were included as covariates and were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating a strong influence of initial performance level on the postintervention outcomes.

Across the different RC subgroups, there was an increasing trend in maximum cIMT ( P < 0.001) as RC levels increased within quartiles.

Determination of Sensitivity, Specificity, and Cut-Off Value of K By comparing with C, sensitivity and specificity of K were determined as 98.5% and 100%, respectively and kappa value was calculated as 0.971 which was found highly significant ( p < 0.001) as shown in Table 4 .

The trend toward housing improvement was also expressed in the highly significant drop in houses having tarred-cardboard roofs, from 52.9% to 31.6% over 0–78 MPS (χ 2 = 40.5, df = 2, p < 0.001), which were replaced by corrugated metal-sheet roofs ( Table 2 ).

Among these, neutrophil_abs demonstrated extremely significant differences ( P < .001) between the groups.

Cumulative N 2 O production, across the incubation, was controlled in majority by the applied moisture regime, which was highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

If using tripartite SCCAg grouping [96 cases in Tertile 1 (0.29–0.67), 89 cases in Tertile 2 (0.68–0.99), and 108 cases in Tertile 3 (1.00–11.50)], the relationship between different levels of SCCAg and EGFR mutation probability showed a trend of first flattening and then decreasing [70.8% (68/96), 68.5% (61/89), and 45.4% (49/108), p < 0.001]; after fully adjusted for covariates, the probability of EGFR mutation was 70.8% (95% CI: 52.9%–84.0%), 74.5% (95% CI: 56.6%–86.8%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 35.4%–73.2%) with the increase of SCCAg level

Combined use of oxytocin and ARM was 41.7% and 77.2% in misoprostol and Foley catheter group, respectively, and statistically it was very highly significant ( p < 0.001).

However, after everolimus treatment, there was a significant reduction in CECs number only in responders, resulting in a highly significant different numbers between responders and non-responders ( p < 0.001), demonstrating the biological activity of everolimus.

CEACAM3 duct values showed a decreasing trend from preoperative through early and later postoperative to 6th-month samples ( p < 0.001).

There is an extremely significant difference between the two hospitals’ mean numbers of clicks ( p < 0. 001), compared with no significant difference between their mean numbers of likes.

Among nonprofessional FSW, “students”, “civil servants” and “housewives” were less often infected (6.10%, 9.83% and 13.00%, respectively), whereas “sellers” showed very high HIV prevalence (31.91%).This large difference in HIV infection between categories was confirmed by highly significant Chi- 2 test for trend (P<0.001).

However, due to the lack of sufficient power in the subsample, the effects on intentions to vaccination against COVID-19 were only marginally significant (effect on social norms F (1, 37) = 62.04, p < 0.001; effects on intentions F (1, 37) = 3.56, p = 0.067).

The factor loading of each measurement item was highly significant ( p < 0.001), ranging from 0.670 to 0.845, which indicates the unidimensionality of the measures.

This difference was found to be statistically highly significant ( P = 0.001).

There was marked depletion of the CD8/CD28 subpopulation which was highly significant in both absolute number ( P < .001) and percentage ( P < .01); decreased expression of the costimulatory molecule on CD8 T cells of TB patients has been reported before [ 16 , 30 ].

There was a significant trend towards increase in the proportion of school-children with NSLBP as age increased despite some inconsistencies at some ages [ X 2 for linear trend = 73.3, p < 0.001] (Figure 2 ).

However, a highly significant relationship was found between T max and starch concentrations ( P <0.001, r 2 =0.84), with increased starch in well-watered plants associated with a decrease in T max ( T max =62.51–0.88×[starch]; Fig. 4A ) compared with drought-treated plants.

Spearman’s rank correlation analysis yielded a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between all three cognitive scoring systems (MMSE, MoCA, and CCS).

Analysis of variance revealed that latitudinal gradient had a highly significant effect on mean densities of adult (F = 18.78, p < 0.001) and juvenile (F = 7.20, p < 0.001) individuals, mean diameter (F = 81.16, p < 0.001) and Lorey's mean height (F = 28.13, p < 0.001) of L. macrocarpa ( Table 4 ).

On intergroup comparison of mean colony count in control and experimental groups at 24 h and 7 days using one-way ANOVA F test was highly significant P < 0.001.

WHC demonstrated highly significant effects of both variety ( p < 0.001) and variety × share interaction ( p < 0.001), while the main effect of incorporation level (share) was non-significant.