Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
That distinction was emphasized by pairwise examination between approaches; the difference between Retinal and Thalamic distributions not rising to significance, but both comparisons with the Cortical distribution were highly significant (ANOVA, F 2, 101 = 9.3, p = 0.000; p R-T = 0.8, p R-C = 0.000, p T-C = 0.003; Fig. 2 i).
highly significantp = 0.0000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The association between graft loss due to PAT and grade of thrombosis proved highly significant (17/25 graft losses occurred in patients with grade 3 thrombosis vs . 7/25 with grade 2 thrombosis in the first 30 post-operative days, p = 0.0000 with the chi-square test).
highly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
“Trust” had a highly significant positive association (p = 0.000);“communication” and “academic attainment” had significant positive associations (p = 0.033 and 0.024, respectively) with VBD acceptance in the students cohort, while these predictors were insignificant in the teachers community.
borderline significantP = .000a p-value is never exactly 0gold
The subjects presented with a 34% increase in STM score after the exercise program, while control subjects with a 17% lower score after exercise.[ 30 ] Association between an increase in right hippocampal volume and improved performance of the Rey Memory Test (rho < 0.23; P < 0.10) was borderline significant.[ 33 ] Resistance programs on functional ability exhibited significant time effects (F (2, 7.791) =32.638; P = .000) in the GAF, with an improvement in scores over time.
highly significantP<0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Very highly significant (P<0.000) The sample size was calculated according to a pre-established formula: N = population size e = Margin of error (percentage in decimal form) Z = Z-score (desired confidence level, 95%: z score = 1.96) The estimated sample size required to achieve a precision of ±0.05% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was 450 females.