MANOVA revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences between all populations in raw data as well as in size-corrected data.
Excerpts
The Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation revealed a significant trend ( p < 0.001), with the most deprived category being overrepresented among cigarette smokers (30.9%) and dual users (33.6%).
In females, the flock effect was highly significant (p < 0.001) except EL in Hassan breed while in males it was non-significant except for Bellary breed showing a high homogeneity between flocks.
The length of the periods between throws in the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions did not differ (Wilcoxon Z = 1.01, p =0.311) and correlated at highly significant level (Spearman R = 0.88, p < 0.001).
Separate analyses showed that this occurred because the interaction was highly significant for cavity-nesting species ( t 34 = −3.659, P < 0.001), significant for ground-nesting species ( t 22 = −2.376, P = 0.016) and non-significant for branch nesting species ( t 75 = −0.838, P = 0.253).
saxicola with differences between the species being highly significant ( Fig. 3 , t-test: t = −22.0, d.f. = 24, P <0.001).
3.4 Predictors of high BP among the study population The univariate analysis shows highly significant ( P < .001) association for most of the risk factors of high BP (Table S1 ).
Zooming in on critical interferon response genes, the heatmaps and GEE analyses of their combined z-score ( Figure 4 a,b) showed that, despite heterogeneity in timing between individuals, there was a highly significant interferon-induced response already on d3 in the low-dose group ( p < 0.001), and on d9 and d6 for the no- and high-dose group, respectively.
The results (see Table 3 ) revealed that student adjustment played a partially significant mediating role in the relationship among needs-supplies fit (=0.32, t = 3.337, p = 0.001), personality-major fit (=0.441, t = 5.48, p = 0.000), and academic achievement.
In contrast, women showed a clear dose–response pattern ( Figure 2 c), with steadily increasing predicted odds of NAFLD across the continuum of UPF intake, and the linear trend was highly significant ( p -value < 0.001). 4.
After censoring non disease-related deaths of patients, the disease-free survival was highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 ).
There was a highly significant difference in the widths of the manifolds ( Fig 2 ) of the 3 members of the Lu . longipalpis complex (df = 147; F = 15.17; P <0.001).
A highly significant model ( R 2 = 63.2%, P < 0.001) was obtained with three variables: year ( b = 0.61 ± 0.12, P < 0.001), June mean temperature ( b = 3.71 ± 1.13 P = 0.002), and first inspection of hives ( b = −0.21 ± 0.09, P = 0.028).
These three percentages were highly significantly different (χ 2 = 19.7; P < 0.001), with a highly significant linear trend ( P < 0.001).
Results Analysis of variance The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) presented in Table 3 indicate that the interaction effect between genotype and environment is highly significant ( p < 0.001) on all 10 traits.
At r = 0.81 the agreement between sABI and aABI was highly significant ( P < .001).
Comparison of first and second scoring of rater LS (intra-observer agreement) exceeded 0.9 for all continuous outcome measures (“qualitative assessment”: ICC agreement = 0.90, with a 95% CI from 0.87 to 0.93; “brow raised”: ICC agreement = 0.94 with a 95% CI from 0.92 to 0.96; “number”: ICC agreement = 0.97, with a 95% CI from 0.96 to 0.98; “angle”: ICC agreement = 0.97, with a 95% CI from 0.96 to 0.98) and 0.8 for the categorical outcome measure (“markedness”: κ = 0.92) with all p -values being highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Finally, a highly significant upregulation of renal versican, i.e. 8.0 fold (p<0.001) increase over control, was observed in rats with Passive Heymann Nephritis (PHN) - a severe model of proteinuric nephropathy which partly resembles human membranous nephropathy (MN) - studied at 6 months.
In non-matched force-rotation, interference was highly significant (Figure 5 D CF vs. nFR (7) , post-hoc , p < 0.001).
There was a highly significant correlation between T I and V T in all groups (p<0.001).
Measurement Comparison between Cardiologists and AI There was a highly significant correlation of LVEF between the two methods (ICC 0.90; p < 0.001), and the Bland–Altman analysis of method differences revealed a mean bias of +4.5 with an estimated LOA of −8.7 and +17.6% ( Figure 2 ).
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that both the treatment protocol and the species of bacteria as well as the interaction between treatment and species of bacteria had highly significant effects on the viability of the cariogenic bacteria in planktonic and biofilm form ( p < 0.001).
The analysis further indicated significant associations between gender and specific injury types, including lacerations, internal injuries, and concussions, with highly significant P values ( P < .001 for all).
In the Chi-square test, the OSCC tissue samples showed a highly significant upregulation of CD96 mRNA expression ( p < 0.001) and protein expression ( p = 0.005) compared to the healthy mucosa.
The associations among the scores on MP1 and MP2 in 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 were all highly significant (gamma ≥ 0.67, p < 0.001), with a particularly high gamma statistic of 0.99 between the severity scores in 2011 and 2012.