Significance levels were set at p > 0.05 (not significant), 0.05 ≥ p > 0.01 (slightly significant), 0.01 ≥ p > 0.001 (significant) and p ≤ 0.001 (highly significant).
Excerpts
Mean raw values of RD from the ROI with significant correlations were extracted and a highly significant correlation was found ( r p = 0.90, p < .001).
Complex S*E Model for Ethiopian Regions The complex model (2) with strain, environment, sex, and all their two-way and three-way interactions showed highly significant S*E effects ( p < 0.001; bold in Table 6 ) when using the Ethiopian region as the environment.
Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed pronounced survival differences, with CON4 and CON1 showing highly significant log-rank tests ( p < 0.001 for both), where high-activity groups had substantially shorter median survival (32.4 vs. 65.5 months for CON4; 30.5 vs. 56.6 months for CON1) ( Figure 4 E,F).
The logarithmic relationships between lake size and WST are highly significant during spring, summer, and autumn ( p < 0.001) and exhibit strong explanatory power (R2 up to 0.74), whereas this relationship is much less significant for winter values, as indicated by markedly lower R2 values and reduced statistical significance.
All three animals, however, showed a highly significant correlation between the delay of hyoid depression (delay relative to start of mouth opening) and duration of mouth opening ( r 22 = 0.772; p < 0.001). 3.3.
Of note, all ICCs were highly significant ( p < 0.001), with correlations ranging from moderate (8’ walk, 0.47), to strong (8’ get-up-and-go, 0.74), to very strong (30 s chair stand, 0.80; sit-and-reach, 0.86; 2 min step test, 0.87; back scratch, 0.90; weight, 0.93; and waist circumference, 0.98).
The differences between the three groups (“much better”, “somewhat better”, and “unchanged”) were highly significant for both physicians’ and patients’ judgement ( p < 0.001).
There was a clearly significant correlation between age and hs-cTnT levels: coefficient = 2.53, standard error = 0.75, t = 3.40, P = 0.001, 95% CI = 1.04–4.02, R 2 = 0.15 (Fig. 3 ).
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed between environments and environment by line interactions (Table S8 ).
Results The comprehensive scores ranked from highest to lowest were DeepSeek (4.47), Qwen (4.33), Kimi (4.24), Doubao (4.13), and ChatGPT (3.41), with highly significant differences were observed among all models ( H =182.14, p < 0.001).
Matrix of pairwise correlations showed a relative decrease of the partial r only between He and Na but it remained highly significant ( r = 0.57; p<0.001).
In addition, RAB3C and STK33 exhibited significant differences ( p < 0.01), while HERC5 demonstrated highly significant differential expression ( p < 0.001), suggesting a potential role in drug resistance and mitophagy-related pathways.
Interestingly, the three patients with the highest mean APOBEC3A/B mutation rate stood out from this trend, and if data from these three patients were excluded, then the association between APOBEC3A/B and SBS89 mutation rates became highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.3.
In non-survivors, a highly significant Th17/Treg ratio was also found in favor of a proinflammatory Th17-response ( P <0.001) (Table 2 ).
Statistical analysis is expected to show a highly significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001), suggesting that the topical NTG-Aloe vera gel provides superior enhancement in perceived quality of life among angina patients.
Age difference remained a highly significant predictor of aggression (p<0.001).
The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed highly significant differences between the three groups (H (2) = 148.458, p < 0.001), and post-hoc Mann–Whitney U tests confirmed significant pairwise differences ( p < 0.001).
DEGs Evaluation First, we identified lists of highly significant DEGs (FDR-adjusted p -value < 0.001) for GII vs.
Regarding employment status, there is a highly significant association with those practicing in academic institutions (64.3%) reporting higher alignment with their envisioned career path ( P value < .001) ( Table 5 ).
The association between the G2254/D752 genotype and neurological disease was found to be highly significant ( p -value <0.001).
Although the improvement of self-care behavior is observed in all six dimensions of self-care in the experimental group, the difference was clearly significant in the dimension of interpersonal communication P<0.001) ( Table 2 , 3 ).
Results and discussion We found that the effect of stretch was highly significant for ACE2 (p < 0.001) within both the Cnt and CSE groups ( Fig. 1 A).
This was statistically highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001).
Cochran‐Armitage testing showed a significant trend of increasing APPs and decreasing ENTs from 2018 to 2022 ( p < 0.001). 3.3.