Excerpts

The amplitude of late ERD ( Figure 4E , white boxes ) was also significantly different across groups (F 2,65 = 11.6, p < 0.001, d = 1.2) with a non-significant reduction in Sz ( p = 0.16) but a highly significant increase in ASD ( p = 0.001).

For the language tasks, the Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test demonstrated a highly significant effect of group, F (2, 54) = 34.829, p < 0.001, and this was driven by all three groups being significantly different from one another: non-native signer < native signer, p = 0.029, non-native signer < hearing, p = 0.001, and native signer < hearing, p = 0.009.

Statistical analysis confirms these findings are highly significant ( p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 3.74).

Geriatric depression was more prevalent in rural populations compared to urban areas, with a highly significant statistical difference found between the two ( P < 0.001).

We detected highly significant (even after Bonferroni correction) and positive linear contrasts for mtDNA/nDNA data (p = 0.001 and p = 0.023 for MGF and MGS, respectively).

Student's t -test revealed that the difference between these data sets was highly significant ( p -value <0.001).

Over time, there has been a decreasing trend for PCV7 serotypes (R 2 = 0.944; p < 0.001, with significant decreasing trends for serotypes 19F, 14, 23F and 9V), and increasing trends for serotype 19A (R 2 = 0.901; p < 0.001), serotype 3 (R 2 = 0.463; p = 0.030) and other non-PCV7 serotypes (R 2 = 0.877; p < 0.001), but not for serotype 6A (R 2 = 0.311; p = 0.094).

One-way ANOVA among groups treated only with Kloroben mouthrinse showed highly significant differences in color stability between materials (F = 221.300; p < 0.001).

When the mean anxiety score of nonadherent group (28.7) was compared with that of adherent group (8.5), the value was found out to be highly significant statistically ( P < 0.001) suggesting high level of anxiety is associated with nonadherence to ART.

Table S8 shows that only the Immunochip loci showed a nominally significant ( P = 0.001) excess of high-ranking BFs (those in the top 5% of the empirical distribution) of genes.

Influence of road, animal and weather on persistence time “All taxa ” The Cox model for the “all taxa ” data set (stratified by taxonomic group) was highly significant (P<0.001), and explained 9.9% of the variance in carcass persistence time.

Mean AL and ACD showed a trend of decrease with increasing age ( P < 0.001).

As expected, sciatic and tibial nerve CSA was markedly increased in CMT1A patients, much greater than in IBM patients and controls with all comparisons highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Exogamy Linguistic exogamy overall was highly significant (p = 0.001) and associated with high borrowing in the total sample.

With regard to outcomes, the effect of stress slope on academic engagement ( β = −0.55, p < 0.001) was stronger than the effect of victimization slope on academic engagement ( β = −0.08, ns ); a deviance test confirmed that this difference was highly significant, χ 2 (1) = 33.63, p < 0.001.

This was due to the ten-fold difference in case rates between the two (Table 1 ; with highly significant (p < 0.001) differences across the boundary - unpublished data).

The Mantel test conducted to assess the statistical significance of the correlation between matrices of distances between both sexes showed a strong and highly significant relationship (r = 0.70, p < 0.001).

Highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlations were detected between LCBD and a complement of physicochemical variables, including potassium ( r = 0.53), TN ( r = 0.50), DIC ( r = 0.45), TP ( r = 0.44), dissolved organic carbon (DOC; r = 0.42), magnesium ( r = 0.40), sodium ( r = 0.38), sulfate ( r = 0.37), chlorophyll a ( r = 0.33), lake colour ( r = 0.22), and pH ( r = 0.22).

The trait correlations were all extremely significant ( P ≤ 0.001), except for the correlation between GL and GW at SZ (−0.08 with P ≤ 0.5) in MH63 background.

In particular, inclusion of ALA, either alone or in combination with wheat and ME, produced pronounced increases in yolk n‐3 content and the n‐3:n‐6 ratio, as reflected by the large effect sizes for these traits (η2 = 0.9861 and 0.9917, respectively) and highly significant ALA main effects ( P < 0.001).

There was a significant effect of cue condition, F (2, 64) = 8.323, p = .001, η p 2 = .206, and a linear contrast respecting the predicted order of cues (ISI, NI, FSI) was highly significant, F (2, 64) = 8.323, p = .001, η p 2 = .206 (see Figure 1 ).

The R 2 change from Model I to II was 0.51, which was highly significant change ( P < 0.001).

The differences in LAA and LA volumes between the stroke/TIA patients and control subjects remained highly significant ( P <0.001) when adjusted for BMI and hypertension, together or separately ( Table 2 ).

2 C) showed a highly significant decreasing trend (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.001) in samples of 2022, and the proportion of windows with positive values significantly decreased.

In male patients, for nicotine, the highly significant model (χ2 (9)=83.8, p<0.001) included age (p<0.001), diagnosis (p<0.01) and age-by-diagnosis (p<0.01) as predictors.