Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Impact of Planting Date and Cultivars on the Duration of Phenological Phases The variance analysis of cycle duration (from VC to R7 stage) in calendar days (CD VC–R7) showed a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) of planting date, cultivar, and the interaction of these two factors ( Table 6 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Occupation, education, age, residence, and monthly expenditure all showed highly significant associations with KAP ( p < 0.001), with occupation (χ2=383.314) and education (χ2=363.490) emerging as the most influential factors (Table 3 ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On statistical comparison between initial stage and different follow-ups, no significant outcome was seen from first follow-up ( P > 0.05) in intensity and duration of pain but comparison between initial stage and different follow-ups showed highly significant results in the second follow-up ( P < 0.001) with regard to all the symptoms, except diarrhea, backache and pain in vagina.
highly significantp=0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After 3 months, patients who had abnormal cholesterol levels had a significantly greater reduction in dietary fat intake than patients with normal cholesterol results (F(2,388)=3.6, p=0.03); correlational analysis showed a highly significant link between reduction in fat intake and reduction in blood cholesterol (the researchers report an R 2 of 0.5, p=0.001, but confirmed by email that a Pearson's correlation was intended).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Specifically, genes such as PNPLA4, DGAT2, MGLL, LIPE, ATP8B1, CETP, PNPLA3, LIPG, LIPA, CPT1A, APOE, CD36, CPT2, ACOX1, MOGAT2, PLIN4, LPL, PNPLA2, and DGAT1 exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), while LYPLA1, SLC27A1, MPP1, PPT1, HADHB, GPAT3, MTTP, LPCAT1, and ZDHHC5 showed moderate differences ( p < 0.05) (Fig. 3 E).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Construct validity The correlations between global ratings (Oral health and overall wellbeing) and the total score ( r = 0.54 and r = 0.46), the subscales: oral symptoms ( r = 0.41 and r = 0.38), functional limitations ( r = 0.38 and r = 0.34), emotional wellbeing ( r = 43 and r = 43), social wellbeing ( r = 45 and r = 41) were weak but highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Table 4 ).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly, a highly significant increase of SIRT4 transcripts was detected in human skin biopsies obtained from photoaged skin (fold increase: 1.91 ± 1.23; median ± SEM, p<0.001; n=16) compared with non-photoaged skin of the same individuals aged 60-66 years or to skin of young individuals (n=15; age range 18-25 years) (Fig. 5A ).