However, the main effect of SOA was highly significant ( F (1.98, 31.66) = 78.62; p = 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.83), showing that the interval between stimuli determined their temporal discriminability.
Excerpts
Notably, the increase in CD127 + γδ Tcell frequencies was highly significant in BAL at d1 (P<0.001) and 1-week (P=0.001) that returned to baseline by 3-week time-point, when BCG was likely cleared as no live bacteria was recovered from BAL fluid at that time.
p-values were all highly significant (p < 0.001) for comparisons of 27°C vs. 23°C and 31°C vs. 27°C (each a 4°C increase), as well as for 31°C vs. 23°C (8°C increase, Additional file 9 : Table S7).
We found that 95.2% of all truncating variants were associated with severe phenotype; this association was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
However, the increase in AST levels was highly significant (p < 0.001) in the EBV/HCV (93.9 ± 11.39 U/mL), HCV (75.4 ± 16.5 U/mL) and EBV (51.5 ± 8.3 U/mL) patients compared to the NC (29.5 ± 14.2) ( Fig. 3 ).
There was a highly significant difference in periodical medical check-ups between CFHs and HCFHs ( p < 0.001).
The results showed that PACTmax was significantly greater than PACTmin, with extremely significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001); PMT was also significantly greater than PACTmin, with extremely significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001); however, there was no significant statistical difference between PMT and PACTmax ( p = 0.689).
The corresponding test for trend was highly significant ( p = 0.001).
Although four of the six significant correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001), their effect size was relatively small (i.e., smaller than 0.3, Cohen, 1992 ).
The positive control, 160 μM MMS, induced an extremely significant (p < 0.001) genotoxic effect compared to the control group with a TAU mean value of 554.2 ± 9.9.
Statistical analyses confirmed a highly significant effect on segregation after BTA for the HaDREB2 gene, when combined with HaHSFA9 in either parental background (for A9#6-7, F = 93.97, P = 0.001; for A9#14-5, F = 116.18, P = 0.001).
However, there are virtually equal frequencies of balanced and unbalanced products at second metaphase, which represent highly significant differences with regard to the expected frequency of balanced cells according to the metaphase I orientations (table I) (x 2 = 10.17, P = 0.001).
All correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Statistical significance was defined as follows: P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant; P < 0.001, very highly significant; and P < 0.0001, extremely highly significant.
The radiological outcomes of femur union in the study reveal a substantial difference between open and closed injuries, supported by a highly significant p-value of <0.001.
P < 0.05 was considered significant (*), P < 0.01 was considered highly significant (**), and P < 0.001 was considered very highly significant (***).
Linear regression analysis revealed a highly significant negative correlation between the LVEF and the MARK4 expression (β = −0.044, 95% confidence interval: −0.059 to −0.030, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 C).
In text p-value < 0.01 indicates significant differences, and highly significant differences are presented as p-value < 0,001.
There was a highly significant difference in percent survival at the different time periods ( F = 4.6; df = 1, 56; P = 0.001).
In comparison, expenses increased to 44.03% (from $211,404 to $304,491), with both changes highly significant (p<.001).
Statistical difference was considered to be significant at a value of P< 0.05 (*), highly significant at a value of P< 0.01 (**) and extremely significant when P< 0.001(***).
The Fisher’s exact test indicated a highly significant relationship between maternal and neonatal parasitemia (p < 0.001).
4 A) revealed a highly significant effect ( F 1,45 = 15.2, p < 0.001) of repeated measures (i.e., a statistically significant increase in grimacing on day 1; 18–36 h post–surgery) but no ZT group × repeated measures interaction ( F 3,45 = 0.05, p = 0.99).
The difference in HIV-1-seropositivity between the diarrheal and non-diarrheal group (19.1% versus 4.8%) was highly significant (p<0.001).
This variation was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), further highlighting the quality distinctions between the two types of meat: grain-fed and grass-fed.