Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Sperm DNA damage In terms of DNA damage, SCSA analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the sperm isolation procedures, with the FelixTM system isolating sperm cells that had less DNA damage than the DGC isolated population ( p < 0.001 ) (Fig. 4A ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comet Assay Results The comet assay demonstrated a statistically highly significant increase in DNA damage (%DNA T ) at O. majorana extract concentrations of 100 and 200 μg/mL compared to the control group ( p < 0.001), whereas the 10 μg/mL concentration did not differ significantly from the control ( p > 0.05).
a positive trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Neonatal central adiposity (determined using waist:length ratio) was negatively associated with maternal age, and positively associated with the following parameters: smoking status, maternal pre-pregnancy arm circumference, percentage energy from saturated fat in late pregnancy, postprandial glucose at 28 weeks gestation and membership of the control group with a positive trend towards association with trimester 2 glycaemic load R 2 adj 38.1% (F = 8.000, p < 0.001).
a positive trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
A positive trend, with a significant decrease in the percentage of AMR was found towards Pivmecillinam (decrease: −142.92%; p < 0.001), Ciprofloxacin (decrease: −31.30%; p < 0.001), Trimethoprim (decrease: −25.62%; p < 0.001), Gentamycin (decrease: −19.58%; p < 0.001), Ampicillin/Amoxicillin (decrease: −12.43%; p < 0.001).
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
CRF developmental trajectories showed an upward trend over five surveys (slope = 0.649, P < 0.001); PD showed a significant weakening trend (slope = − 0.583, P < 0.001); SD showed an increasing trend (slope = 0.345, P < 0.001), and QoL showed a statistically significant weakening trend (slope = − 0.373, P < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding the relationship between the indicators and their latent factors, highly significant factor loadings suggest that participants with higher scores in PVS tended to have more hedonic affect ( β = 0.545, p < 0.001), better habituation ( β = 0.810 p < 0.001) and less anhedonia ( β = − 0.758, p < 0.001).