Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the analysis of normally distributed variables (SP, GAD, total anxiety, and total internalization), all inter-subdimension correlations were positive, strong, and highly significant (ρ between 0.587 and 0.979; p < 0.001), with the near-perfect relationship between total anxiety and total internalization standing out (ρ = 0.979, expected given their overlapping composition).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The validity of the HIT has been supported in relation to numerous constructs, including the ability to distinguish delinquent from non-delinquent populations, and highly significant ( p < .001) positive correlations with measures of externalizing behavior ( r = .52), aggressive behavior ( r = .38), antisocial behavior ( r = .55), delinquent behavior ( r = .41), and low empathy ( r = .42) (Gini and Pozzoli 2013 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation of UCE Capture with Specimen Age and DNA Quality We found that all investigated variables (pre-library DNA concentration, post-library DNA concentration, raw read count, UCE locus count, UCE mean contig length and UCE reads on target) decreased with increasing specimen age, and this negative correlation was highly significant in all cases (R = -0.36–0.75 and p < 0.001; Table 2 , Fig 2A–2E ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the quadratic regression models for both systems were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while the lack-of-fit terms were not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating good model fit and accurate prediction of interactions among multiple components.
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Similarly, there was an increasing trend in the total PQ base dosage administered (242.6 ± 79.7 vs. 265.7 ± 92.3 mg, P < 0.001), despite no significant differences in total weight-based PQ base dosage administered (3.38 ± 1.1 vs. 3.64 ± 1.3 mg/kg, P = 0.256) or the proportion of patients in the underdosing group (< 3.5 mg/kg; 296 [73.6%] vs. 167 [68.2%], P = 0.135] between the two periods.
highly significantP -values < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation Between AFABP Levels and Birth Weight, Gestational Age, and Z-Score of Birth Weight Cord blood A-FABP [ 16 ] was highly significant, negatively correlated with birth weight and gestational age (both P -values < 0.001, r = -0.668 and r = -0.691), but not with z-score of birth weight ( P = 0.37, r = -1.02).