Excerpts

Effect of gender The gender of lamb showed a highly significant effect (p<0.001) on birth weight (BW), ADG1, WW, and MW.

The level of significance denoted with double asterisks means highly significant P < .001 values. 3.

Galling Insect Richness x Tree Species x Forest Type Our initial (maximal) model was highly significant (d.f. = 36,41; P<0.001) and explained 83% of variability observed in the galling insect richness (GIR).

In immunohistochemical staining, leptin receptor expressions in the case and control groups were 57.8 and 2.3%, respectively, which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).

An omnibus Χ 2 test identified a highly significant effect of treatment (ie dsRNA target) on pupal sex ratio ( Χ 2 = 22.8, df = 2, P < 0.001), which further post‐hoc testing showed was the result of a significant deviation of SepA‐like injected pupal sex from either AmCyan ( P < 0.001) or CCCH pupae ( P < 0.001), which themselves did not differ significantly ( P > 0.05) (Table 1 ).

When samples were subdivided into the proposed four groups, F ST values were low but highly significant (p<0.001) and ranging from 0.0015 in the comparison between WMED and AEG to 0.0070 in the comparison between the ION and ATL clusters.

The overall logistic fit between percentage toxicity (Y) and log concentration of ivalin (X) was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the different exposure times.

There was a very strong and highly significant correlation (r = 0.905, p < 0.001; Spearman test, Fig. 1 ) between the actual INR and estimated INR values, with a maximum difference in INR of 0.2 units, which is not clinically significant.

Antibodies to other antigens degenerated more rapidly in younger individuals (EBA181, p = 0.02; PfRh2, p = 0.05) and the decline of MSP2 antibodies in younger individuals was highly significant (p = 0.001) ( Fig 3B ).

Considering the statistical noise in GWAS data and more than 90% of genetic variants from GWAS being located in the non-coding regions, for each GWAS trait, we used moderately significant associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with chi-squared P value < 1 × 10 −3 .

We found a significant trend for both crows individually [crow 1: L (4) = 1722.5, P < 0.001; crow 2: L (4) = 1334.5, P < 0.001, Page’s trend test].

p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant, p < 0.01 was regarded as highly significant, and p < 0.001 was regarded as extremely significant. 5.

There was a significant trend to a higher incidence of insufficient prophylaxis with increasing Apfel score ( p < 0.001) with 1585 patients with an Apfel score of 3 or 4 receiving insufficient prophylaxis.

Similarly, the static water contact angle of chitosan conjugated titanium was highly hydrophilic (39.2 ± 0.6°), while fluorinated conjugated samples containing chitosan displayed hydrophobic contact angles (108.2 ± 5.2°), which dictated a highly significant change ( p -value < 0.001).

To assess whether intensity changes were associated with tempo effects on anticipation times, the effects of key velocity on anticipation times were partialled out, as before; the effect of tempo on residual finger anticipation times was still highly significant ( F (4,40) = 16.10, p <.001).

Pain ratings The linear contrast was highly significant for pain ratings, t (29) = 19.06, P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.92 .

Out-of-sample cross-validation and significance testing against 10,000 between subject permutations of the imaging data demonstrated a highly significant mode of covariation between the pattern of D2/3 receptor availability in the striatum and the pattern of CBF (mean out of sample r p = 0.51, P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3, A and B ).

A trend of decreasing MoCA scores with higher serum neuropeptide FF levels after SCI was noted, and the intergroup differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.3.

Overall, a statistically significant difference in the absolute threshold across all test cases was found χ 2 (5) = 45.53, p < 0.001, as well as a highly significant effect of electrovibration duration ( χ 2 (1) = 36.63, p < 0.001).

LV mass index (p = 0.001), IVSd (p < 0.001), and LVPWd (< 0.001) demonstrated a highly significant difference between positive and negative 99m Tc-PYP groups. 99m Tc-PYP positive patients had a higher relative apical sparing of LV LS (p < 0.001), and notably, no 99m Tc-PYP negative patient had a ratio > 1.0.

The median levels of CSF o-α-syn were slightly increased in the PD group (Table 3 ); however, when the oligomeric/total α-syn ratio (o/t-α-syn ratio) was calculated, increased values in the PD group with respect to OND subjects were highly significant ( P < 0.001; Table 3 ).

Statistical significance was considered at a P -value <0.05 and highly significant at a P -value <0.001.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirms that all fitted slopes are statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001 for all), robustly supporting the declining trend.

The severity of the cervical lesions and p16, Ki67, and p16/Ki67 IS showed an increasing trend (Multinomial Cochran-Armitage trend test, all P < 0.001).

Similarly, incorporating H‐FABP into the revised Mayo 2012 Stage increased the C‐index from 0.611 to 0.66 ( p = 0.032) and yielded a highly significant IDI of 0.074 (95% CI: 0.010–0.166, p < 0.001).