Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results revealed a highly significant difference in genome size between cultivated and wild jujube (U = 22494.0, p < 0.001), with the median genome size of cultivated jujube (3.49 × 10 8 ) being significantly larger than that of wild jujube (3.37 × 10 8 ), and the Common Language Effect Size (CL = 0.355) confirming the practical relevance of this difference.
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean levels of serum COMP in ng/ml, CTX-II in ng/ml, DKK1in pg/ml, TNF-αpg/ml, and IL-17 pg/ml were 5.71 ±7.04, 0.45 ±0.27, 5619.1 ±1731.4: 2.70 ±1.31, 0.23 ±0.16, 3276.96 ±1306.77, 6.4 ±2.25: 1.55 ±0.61, and 14.3 ±3.88: 5.86 ±1.09, respectively, with highly significant difference ( p = 0.001, for five biomarkers).
an increasing trendP = .0010.0× alphagold
The total amount of opioids dispensed in the first prescription after surgery decreased in the 2 years following the CDC guideline release, compared with an increasing trend in the 2 years prior (prerelease trend: 1.43 MME/month; 95% CI, 0.62 to 2.24 MME/month; P = .001; postrelease trend: −2.18 MME/month; 95% CI, −3.01 to −1.35 MME/month; P < .001; trend change: −3.61 MME/month; 95% CI, −4.87 to −2.35 MME/month; P < .001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This resulted in less overlap between the 95% data ranges of the lower iodine concentrations, as can be appreciated from the linear relationships depicted in Figure 20 , which is a comparison of R 2 values, demonstrating the highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between the methods without DAC-shifting and with DAC-shifting. 4.
highly significantP =0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Spindle power for gained ‘cued' words without feedback was higher as compared with gained ‘cued+feedback' words ( P =0.05) and the interaction between the factors feedback (‘cued' versus ‘cued+feedback') and memory consequence (‘gains' versus ‘loss') was highly significant ( F (1,19) =15.31, P =0.001; η 2 =0.32).
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Microbial Counts in Lamb Burgers with Lupine Flour Treated by High Hydrostatic Pressure The results of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effects of treatment, formulation, and their interaction on the different microorganisms at day 1 ( Table 3 ) showed that HHP treatment exerted a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.001) on mesophilic, psychrophilic, molds and yeasts, total coliforms, and E. coli , while S. aureus was significantly affected at p ≤ 0.01.
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
spinosum showed a strong and highly significant association with the ordination configuration (NMDS1 = 0.9999, NMDS2 = 0.0110, r 2 = 0.353, p = 0.001; 999 permutations), indicating that shrub dominance was closely aligned with the primary compositional gradient captured by the NMDS.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The two models, one containing only the full set of main effects predictors and the other containing an additional interaction term were highly significant (Wald χ 2 = 234.37; df = 14; p < 0.001 and Wald χ 2 = 246.63; df = 17; p < 0.001, respectively), indicating a good fit of both models to the data when compared to the null model consisting only of a randomly varying intercept.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference between PF-A and RO-A (independent of conditions) proved highly significant with large effect size in a Chi-square test between BRI = 1 and BRI = 0, χ 2 (1, N = 89) = 33.5, p < 0.001, w = 0.61, indicating that PF-A is strongly associated with body reference, while RO-A is not.