Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.00180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In addition, mean differences between the three rank groups were highly significant for blue-red contrast residuals (Kruskal-Wallis χ 2 = 12.5, p = 0.0018) while being not significant for blue saturation residuals (KW χ 2 = 5.68, p = 0.058) and for red saturation residuals (Kruskal-Wallis χ 2 = 5.45, p = 0.065), although both are close to significance.
highly significantp = 0.00180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Body mass showed highly significant ( p = 0.0018) differences depending on spine type and in post-hoc analyses, a significant difference ( p = 0.0230) concerned the comparison of the groups “decreased kyphosis and increased lordosis” and “increased kyphosis and increased lordosis”.
highly significantp < 0.00180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The regression analysis, using λ as the dependent variable and only the guanaco population size (in natural logs, LnNtot ) as the independent variable, was highly significant (AIC = -87.847, p < 0.0018, and F = 11.48,) and the resulting regression equation was λ = 1.6373 – 0.0552 (±0.0163) Ln Ntot ( Table 2 ).
highly significantP = .00180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A study of the benefit of HSCT showed that the difference in mean overall survival time between those who underwent transplantation (9 allogeneic [allo], 1 autologous) and those who did not was highly significant (31.3 vs 12.8 months; P = .0018). 4 Less information is available on the optimal therapeutic approach to LS-BPDCN specifically.
highly significantP = 0.00180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Kaplan–Meyer curves analyzing tumor engraftment in function of the time from injection, followed by Log-rank (Mantell–Cox test), showed a highly significant difference between FRTL5-Ras-PATZ1-injected mice and their controls ( P = 0.0018; HR = 0.1914; 95% CI 0.01456-0.2701) ( Figure 1 a).
highly significantP=0.00180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Subgroup analysis In the subgroup analysis of patients who had received first-line treatment according to the TKI strategy, the PFS still exhibited a highly significant difference between the two groups (P=0.0018) ( Figure 4 ): the mPFS was 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.6–6.8 months) in the regorafenib group and 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.2–32.4 months) in the combination group.
marginally significantp = 0.00180.0× alphagold
When we expanded t tests to include all 35 comparisons—and, like above, corrected for 35 comparisons—we found a significant difference in inference scores between students who exhibit mastery on question 5 and students who do not ( t = 3.41, p = 0.0012, d = 0.88), as well as a marginally significant difference in these students’ induction scores ( t = 3.26, p = 0.0018, d = 0.84; the Holm-Bonferroni cutoff is p = 0.00147).
highly significantP < 0.00180.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These differences were highly significant (0.0001 < P < 0.0018) in the C57BL/6, 129S6 and BALB/c backgrounds, but less so in the CBA/Ca background (0.017 < P < 0.048), and not significant for the specific comparison of the CBA/Ca homozygotes at 32 and 16 kHz ( P = 0.11).
Hearing loss in a mouse model of Muenke syndrome.
Hum Mol Genet · 2009 · PMC2644644
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.00180.0× alphagold
3A,D : F (2,26) = 2.51, p = 0.10) was a nonsignificant trend, the number of cFos-positive cells was significantly decreased in the CPu (Fig. 3B,E : F (2,30) = 7.871, p = 0.0018) and the dorsal hippocampus (CA3) (control: 100 ± 10.3, PS: 80.7 ± 11.1, ES: 59.5 ± 9.7; F (2,30) = 3.761, p = 0.0349) of ES mice compared to controls, with a similar non-significant trend observed in the dorsal DG (Fig. 3C,F : F (2,30) = 3.217, p = 0.0542).