Five year postoperative survival is 33% and a highly significant trend (P=0.002) in favour of the older patients is reported.
Excerpts
With respect to the 10-year trend by region, only “unspecified” showed a repeating pattern of statistically significant increase and decrease up to 2014, followed by an increasing trend starting from 2015 ( P = 0.002).
This trend was highly significant for telomerase activity (univariate test of significance for planned comparison, F = 13.07, p = 0.002), and it was borderline significant for TL ( F = 4.07, p = 0.06).
In our study, we could see a highly significant rise in salivary ALP levels in gingivitis ( P =0.002) and periodontitis patients ( P =0.001) as compared to the healthy controls [ Table 1a ], thereby indicating the pathological changes occurring in the underlying periodontal tissues.
Results MR images and dMRI revealed the development of a highly significant increase in BBB permeability (P < 0.002) and ventricle size (P < 0.0001) among infected rats.
Nevertheless, the changes in the Fs-LASIK group are more predictable at 3 months postop, because the intergroup differences in the correlation coefficients for the J0 vector were highly significant (P=.002).
Finally, consistent with this selective context-memory order-effect, a highly significant correlation was identified between context-memory retention for List2 information in the Nap-group and prior stage-2 NREM sleep ( r = 0.77, P = 0.002, Figure 4D ), yet no such association between context-memory for List1 information and stage-2 NREM was observed ( r = 0.16, P = 0.60, Figure 4B ).
There was a significant trend for duration of use ( P trend =0.004) with an OR of 0.66 (95% CI 0.51–0.86, P =0.002) for more than 24 months of use.
In addition, the relationship between arm vascular conductance and deep venous plasma [ATP] during heating was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.49, P = 0.002).
On statistical analysis, the duration of anastomosis was highly significant (p=0.002) (Figure 1 ).
Although consistent with our observations for weight gain as a continuous trait, the interaction observed in the case-noncase analyses was only borderline significant after correcting for multiple testing ( P = 0.002).
The difference in R 1 between this longer illness group ( n = 9) and HCs ( n = 30) was highly significant (F 1,37 = 11.20, p = 0.002).
Nevertheless, the difference in decrease between the LSTAs showing ON and OFF polarity is highly significant ( p = 2 × 10 −3 , Fisher exact test).
Multivariate analyses revealed response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy highly significant correlated to improved recurrence-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.017).
Even though there were very few PAI-1 positive tumours in organ confined stages (T1/T2), this molecular marker turned out to be a highly significant predictor of developing metachronous metastasis in these patients with HR = 13,71 (p = 0.002).
In the 5-week samples, the decrease of Mecp2 mRNA was nominally significant ( p = 0.002), with the adjusted p value falling just short of significance (0.058) (Additional file 3 : Table S2).
The regression retained only skin yellowness as a predictor of attractiveness, and the effect of skin yellowness was positive and highly significant (F(1,71) = 10.806, Beta = .366, t = 3.287, p<.002).
Statistical analysis confirmed that this reduction in the number of tests compared to the pre-pandemic period was highly significant ( p = 0.002).
T-tests on changes from baseline show that, at all time points throughout the study, the HDL/TC improvement from baseline was highly significant (p < 0.002).
Emotional Feedback: C (1.94) highest score, Highly significant difference ( p = .002): C > A,B.
Inhibition of VSV infection by DN-Rab5 was highly significant (p = 0.002), but the small inhibition observed with DN-Rab11 was not (p = 0.1549).
Specifically, modules 13 (overall upregulated) and module 3 (overall downregulated) were found highly significant with a correlation of 0.97 ( P = .002) and −0.99 ( P = 1e‐5), respectively (Figure S2 and Table S4 ).
There was a highly significant reduction in tumour volume (median reduction 68.6 cm 3 ) after treatment ( P =0.002, Figure 1 ).
A correlation analysis between the staining pattern of the two antibodies revealed a highly significant correlation ( P = 0.002; r = 0.55), corroborating the validity of the staining protocol.
However, when the data from the 3 visits were combined and corrected for repeated measurements, there was a significant trend toward higher levels of CRP in affected individuals ( P = 0.002 versus unaffected).