Excerpts

Results Stiffness (S) showed highly significant differences (p = 0.002) with 202.25 ± 27.010 N/mm SD (Group 1) and 184.66 ± 35.875 N/mm SD (Group 2).

There was also a significant trend towards increased non-HDL-C levels for APOA5 rs651821 C carriers (TT genotype: 3.01 ± 0.80 mmol/L; non-TT genotype: 3.24 ± 0.92 mmol/L; P = 0.002).

As expected, the forwards had a substantially larger body mass than the back line, with highly significant differences observed in height, weight and measures of neck and chest circumference (p < 0.002).

Five year postoperative survival is 33% and a highly significant trend (P=0.002) in favour of the older patients is reported.

In a continuous assessment, improved adherence by two points is associated with a highly significant ( P -value=0.002) reduction in overall cancer incidence.

Three days later, the 30 and 100 mg/kg doses induced 40% and 59% tumor growth inhibition, respectively (p = 0.030 (this p value represents a strong trend) and p = 0.002, respectively).

However, the correlations between IL-6 and headache (r = 0.572, p = 0.017) and between IL-6 and concentration problems (r = 0.536, p = 0.027) showed a trend towards significance (taking into account multiple comparisons, a conservative p -value cut-off was applied for statistical significance, which was set at p < 0.002).

However, the quadratic model for TPC exhibited a highly significant lack‐of‐fit ( p = 0.002), indicating that the model did not adequately fit the experimental data (see Table S4 ).

However, age group (p = 0.085 for RSV+/SARS) and health care sector distribution (p = 0.763 for RSV+/SARS) did not reach statistical significance, whereas health care sector distribution (p = 0.002 for RSV+/Defined etiology) remained significant at p < 0.05.

It is important to note that although we did not test pre-specified cutoffs of this signature in the GEICAM/9906 trial, the HR for OS in the low quartile group was highly significant in magnitude and p value (unadjusted HR = 0.232, p = 0.002).

Pooled from quadruplicate experiments, the highest level of necrosis plus apoptosis was seen with the PB combination in all cell lines from 56% to 80%, followed by EB from 41% to 73% and lastly with EY from 31% to 65% (one-way analysis of variance, P = .03) ( Figure 2 B ).When a two-way analysis of variance was undertaken, the influence of different CBs was highly significant ( P = .002), but ER status was not ( P = .3).

We tested for overall differences among the subtypes with PERMANOVA, with highly significant results ( p = 0.002).

We observed that GBM cells express and secrete miRNA-125b, and the treatment with rutin induces a highly significant reduction in the levels of this miRNA at both intracellular (** p < 0.002) and secretome (* p < 0.02), compared with control cultures ( Figure 2 ). 2.3.

These trends in IS and SWS were not significant, but as per above this was due to the low TST in the first hour of night: when this hour was omitted, there was a highly significant linear decrease in both IS (slope = -4.90 s/hour of night, r 2 = 0.732, p = 0.002) and SWS (slope = −7.66 s/hour of night, r 2 = 0.753, p = 0.001).

Mentalizing categories The effect of mentalizing category was highly significant, F (2, 350) = 6.54, p = 0.002.

Although, as above, there was no effect in saturation values ( F (1,109) = 1.596, p = .209), there was a highly significant effect in luminance ( F (1,109) = 9.708, p = .002).

The model was highly significant (p = 0.002) and explained 37% of the AIDS incidence variation among the municipalities (R = 0.61).

Interaction analysis yielded a highly significant interaction between age and eGFR ( P =0.002), but not for smoking and eGFR ( P =0.288).

We observed a significant trend toward longer fragments after enrichment for all experiments (Fig. 5 , Additional file 3 : Figure S2) (paired samples t-test , p -value = 0.002), consistent with previous findings [ 8 , 17 , 41 ].

Table 2 shows a highly significant correlation between a family history of oral cancer and awareness of risk factors for oral cancer ( P = 0.002), with 95% of respondents with a family history of oral cancer having knowledge of risk factors for mouth cancer in the highest category.

The significant interaction reflects that there was no significant difference between the reporting of the two modified motif types in the unfamiliar condition (p = 0.452, average response latencies for discriminating gap and noise motifs from the from the background of complete motifs were 1002 and 955 ms, respectively), whereas there was a highly significant difference in the response latencies for reporting the two modified motif types in the familiar condition (p = 0.002, average response latencies for discriminating gap and noise motifs from the from the background of complete motifs were 1219 and 1478 ms, respectively).

Besides, when the stroma was denser (TSR < 1), E-cadherin expression showed a decreasing trend, exhibiting a significant statistical significance ( P = 0.002) (Supplementary Table 1).

There is a weak positive intra-co-relation between ORA and IR, which is highly significant (ρ = 0.175; p = 0.002).

A highly significant reduction of PCT concentration on D(1) was observed in both groups (p = 0.002 in controlled, p = 0.005 in not controlled).

Analyses on all participants combined ( Figure 1D ) showed a highly significant increase in relative mtDNAcn associated with benzene levels for both unadjusted (7.8% increase; 95% CI: 2.9, 13.0; p = 0.002) and adjusted regressions (10.3% increase; 95% CI: 5.4, 15.5; p < 0.001).