Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 0 0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Survival according to site of initial distant metastasis Nuimber Site of of patients first distant I-- metastasis MI F Soft tissues 33 45 Visceral or osseous 62 52 Cerebral 11 13 Total 106 110 Median survival (months) M F 6 8 3-5 7 4 3 4 7 p N.S. 0 002> N.S. 0-02 No treatment Surgery Radiotherapy Chemo- or immunotherapy Combined modalities Unknown M 33 4 21 14 26 8 F 31 5 21 18 28 7 Total 106 110 aries, disparity between the sexes was highly significant (P = 0 002).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In three cases (5.1%), more than one sample was available from the same tumour and in these cases, Ki-67 index varied by no more than 8%. Correlation of Ki-67 index with known prognostic factors Ki-67 index was correlated with known prognostic factors. There was a highly significant positive correlation between Ki-67 index and both T stage (rs = 0.44, P = 0.002) and histological grade (rs = 0.60, P <0.001).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that an increase in fat mass percentage resulted in decreased AMVF incidence (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70–0.97; p = 0.018), while occupation (moderate or heavy work) remained a highly significant predictor (HR: 57.76, 95% CI: 4.23–788.57; p = 0.002).
marginally statistically significantp = 0.0020.0× alphagold
The disease was statistically significantly associated with other chronic DM complications such as: i) peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.001), however, the association was only marginally statistically significant when adjusted for sex and duration of disease (logistic regression adjusted OR 1.70 95% CI 0.90–3.21); ii) coronary artery disease (p = 0.002), but again was only marginally statistically significant when adjusted for sex and duration of disease (adjusted OR 1.96 95% CI 0.91–4.22); and, iii) peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.009), however, this effect disappeared when adjusted for sex and duration of disease (Table 5 ).
borderline significanceP=0.0020.0× alpha
Although the differences in quality of life scores between the intervention and control groups only achieved borderline significance on 7 and 28 days (P=0.002 and P=0.046, respectively), both groups demonstrated a gradual improvement in quality of life (P<0.001 for both groups in trend analysis; table 2 ).