Excerpts

The overall HER2 positivity rate for patients characterised as having a gastric site (proximal and distal stomach combined) was 79% and 21% for those with GEJ site, where the association was found to highly significant (P=0.002).

Despite the small number of patients, the difference between first and last BFRCS score was highly significant [ t (6) = 5.2, p = 0.002, n = 7, exclusion of the patient with Kanner scale], indicating that catatonia was more severe at the beginning [16.4 (SD 4.1)] than at the end of the course of tDCS [8.9 (SD 6.5)].

In the stratified analysis, the risk was higher in each subsequent quartile, with a significantly higher risk in the fourth quartile in comparison to the lowest quartile (HR: 1.39, 95% CI; 1.12–1.72), with a significant trend over the quartiles ( p ‐value = 0.002, see Table 3 ).

In contrast, after irradiation with 2 Gy we have found a highly significant induction of DNA damage using neutral and alkaline comet assay (t-test, p = 0.002 and 0.000002, respectively).

Whether the child was born in or immigrated to Canada was also highly significant in the unadjusted model ( p = 0.002); children born in Canada spent an average of 8.0 h (95% CI = 7.5–8.5 h/week) playing outdoors per week, while newcomer children spent less, an average of only 6.2 h (95% CI = 5.2–7.2 h/week) per week.

For the species analysis along with the explanatory variables the unrestricted Monte Carlo permutation tests (499 permutations) of the significance of the canonical axes indicate axis 1 as statistically highly significant (p = 0.002).

Accordingly, the age‐related increase in firing frequency was highly significant only in the wildtype mouse cerebellum ( P = 0.002), but not in the lethargic mouse cerebellum ( P = 0.2).

However, the interaction between site and period was highly significant (F = 9.044, p = 0.002; Table S5 ).

Even when applying a Bonferroni correction given there were two models specified in this study, this result remains highly significant at p = 0.002.

Differences between means and grand means in concentration approached significance for mental preparation, t (6) = 5.5, p = 0.002, and technique, t (9) = 4.49, p = 0.002.

Those who received chemotherapy also showed a trend for receiving tamoxifen (43.1% vs. 34.6%, P = 0.002).

The difference in R 1 between this longer illness group ( n = 9) and HCs ( n = 30) was highly significant (F 1,37 = 11.20, p = 0.002).

In particular, a strong and highly significant correlation was found for samples from the North Region (n = 8, R 2 = 0.751, p < 0.002).

Although consistent with our observations for weight gain as a continuous trait, the interaction observed in the case-noncase analyses was only borderline significant after correcting for multiple testing ( P = 0.002).

Remarkably, a support-vector machine-based multiparameter classificator built on these data achieved highly significant prediction performance with a balanced accuracy of 82.7% (Sens. = 76.5%, Spec. = 88.9%, p = 0.002, Fig. 1 a and Table 2 ).

The linear trend for all four groups was highly significant (R 2 = 0.48, p = 0.002).

The ammonia levels showed a decreasing trend over time ( P = 0.002).

Analysis of the first 15-min time-window only, the point at which morphine-induced locomotion was typically largest, revealed a highly significant drug × day interaction [F(3,18) = 7.35; p = 0.002], reflecting the widening difference between saline and drug days as conditioning progressed: activity increased across morphine days, but decreased across saline days.

Conversely, there was a lower abundance of long-chain ACs in both NPDR groups, this difference being highly significant in the mild NPDR group ( P = 0.002; Figure 2A ).

Results Stiffness (S) showed highly significant differences (p = 0.002) with 202.25 ± 27.010 N/mm SD (Group 1) and 184.66 ± 35.875 N/mm SD (Group 2).

This value, however, showed a highly significant difference for spiders (p = 0.002).

Jonckheere’s test showed a significant trend in the data for the treatment observation period ( J = 515, p = 0.002) and the post-treatment observation period ( J = 406.5, p ≤ 0.001). 3.2.2.

Thus, in the 100-year (1897–1997) study presenting rates of death and cancer among British radiologists, the authors report “an increasing trend in risk of cancer mortality with time since first registration with a radiological society (p=0.002), such that in those registered for more than 40 years there was a 41% excess risk of cancer mortality” [ 12 ].

In addition, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the length of time since the Glenn procedure and HCT level ( P = .002), indicating that the longer the time since Glenn shunting, the higher the patient’s HCT level.

However, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002) was observed in the Heidelberg score at 3 months in the success group (SG) compared to the failure group (FG).