Excerpts

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference in AUC between the Multi-score model and the other three models (P<0.002).

A test for trend in BuChE inhibition by number of Q alleles and plasma PON1 activity levels was highly significant ( n = 163, p = 0.002).

However, for the top 300 bound regions, there is an obvious further preferential overlap among A-P early regulators as well as a moderate preference among the A-P pair rule factors and the D-V factors (Bonferroni corrected Mann Whitney tests suggest that, taken collectively, the preferential co-binding among A-P early regulators is highly significant ( P < 9 × 10 -15 ), while that among the A-P pair rule factors and the D-V factors is moderately significant ( P < 2 × 10 -3 ) for both; Additional data file 13).

In addition, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the length of time since the Glenn procedure and HCT level ( P = .002), indicating that the longer the time since Glenn shunting, the higher the patient’s HCT level.

The results for indication for ultrasound examination were highly significant ( P = 0.002) while the results for CUA did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.09).

Both current smoking rate and cessation rate remained to be highly significant even after controlling for age, education, occupation, and living apartment (p = 0.002 for current smoking rate and p = 0.004 for cessation rate).

In both groups, the difference between the vitamin E and no-vitamin E groups was highly significant in the logrank test (P = 0.002).

The increase in ELISPOT response at one week was highly significant for Ag85A peptides (p = 0.002), Ag85A protein (p = 0.004), and PPD-T (p<0.001).

The difference at each corresponding dose was highly significant ( P < 0.002).

In a continuous assessment, improved adherence by two points is associated with a highly significant ( P -value=0.002) reduction in overall cancer incidence.

We observed a highly significant effect of “sleep stage” (F 2,144 = 6.49; P = 0.002) and a near significant effect of “frequency band” (F 7,72 = 2.13; P = 0.051), but no effect of “locus” and no interaction.

The linear trend for all four groups was highly significant (R 2 = 0.48, p = 0.002).

In addition, when the three data sets that examined strain effects were combined, the effect of strain on E" was highly significant (p = 0.002).

Zenith‐to‐nadir difference No significant effect of training was observed in MCAv mean ( P = 0.837); however, a difference was apparent for MAP ( P = 0.002), with the RE‐trained showing a significantly greater zenith‐to‐nadir difference (see Table 4 ). 4.

The Control Group, on the other hand, showed slightly significant changes in body water content (2.1%, p = 0.002), muscle volume (2.0%, p = 0.002), lean muscle mass (2.0%, p = 0.002) and basal metabolism (1.4%, p = 0.002).

A runs test ( Horn et al., 1984 ) shows that the grouping of channel activity is highly significant ( P < 0.002), even in this experiment where pulses were delivered at 5-s intervals.

Only one of these patients developed oral mucositis, a difference that was highly significant (P = 0.002).

3.64 prey/h), and this is highly significant (Mann–Whitney U = 5.0, p = 0.002, r = 0.90). 3.3.

These continuous models fully supported the stability of our primary findings, with profession remaining a highly significant predictor of higher scores (β=2.1, 95% CI, 0.80-3.40; p=0.002).

cochlear implant hearing aid electroencephalography auditory evoked potentials source localization speech recognition bimodal benefit auditory rehabilitation Post-implantation, paired t tests ( t values) and Wilcoxon tests in case of non-normality ( z values) showed significant improvements of speech recognition with the CI ear between T3 and T4 for the OlSa S0 ( z = 3.296, ∗∗ p < 0.001), S0N0 ( t = 3.300, ∗∗ p < 0.001), and S0NHA ( z = 2.638, ∗ p < 0.009) conditions when applying the Bonferroni-corrected significance limen for significant ∗ ( p < 0.01) and highly significant ∗∗ ( p < 0.002) differences ( Figure 1 ).

Although there was a rather high variation between experiments, the reduction for these four sites was highly significant ( p values ≤ 0.002 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

At the population level, the main effect of probability ratio was highly significant in both monkeys, with t-statistics consistently exceeding chance expectations (all sessions p < 0.002; Fig. 1e , bottom panel).

These variables were entered into the multivariate logistic regression model, which showed that individuals aged 70 years or older had a significantly higher likelihood of being within the molecular transmission network compared to those aged under 25 years (OR = 2.17, 95% CI:1.02-4.62), with a positive trend observed across increasing age groups (trend χ2=9.695, p=0.002).

It is worth noting that the analysis of results showed that the triple interaction among the group, brain regions and frequency bands was extremely significant, F (4, 348) = 4.38, p = 0.002, η 2 p = 0.05.

4 represents a highly significant correlation ( R 2 =0.69, p =0.002), fitting the relationship: Malaria mortality rate = e [ ( PfPR × 0.6274 ) + 0.7023 ] An important area of uncertainty in malaria epidemiology is the ratio of malaria-specific mortality rates between children and adults.