Excerpts

Based on a bootstrap test for comparing AUC-ROCs of two ROC curves, the difference was highly significant for all datasets ( p < 0.005) except for Li2020 ( p = 0.018), and not significant for Carvalho2018 ( p = 0.33) and Ramella2018 ( p = 0.147).

However, the results remained highly significant (RR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.79; p = 0.005).

In the COMET group, there was no significant change between final IOP and preoperative IOP ( p = 0.107) compared to the ACLET group, where there was highly significant change between final IOP and preoperative IOP ( p = 0.005).

Results For 2008–2009, hospital-specific curves differed from other hospitals: borderline significant for AMI (p=0.064), highly significant (p≤0.005) for the remainder.

In our study, only total lymphocytes showed a significant trend across the three categories, being highest in the favorable group and least in the adverse group ( p = 0.005).

While similar numbers of the mutant from low dose challenge were present in the lungs at day 2 PI, recovery dropped off to significantly fewer numbers by day 4 PI ( P <0.05), and to a highly significant difference by day 7 PI ( P <0.005) ( Fig. 10A ).

On the other hand, postpartum depression showed a trend of initially increasing and then decreasing ( S = 0.92, P = 0.005), peaking at 6 weeks postpartum (9.23 points) and slightly declining by 12 weeks (8.67 points).

After adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, these associations were still highly significant for ischemic heart failure (OR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.60–0.91, P = 0.005) and retained borderline significance for nonischemic heart failure (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.61–1.00, P = 0.050). 3.3.

As anticipated, there was an increasing trend of total Car amount (p < 0.005) in model, contributing to elevating the total level from 748.8 ± 48.19 nmol/mL serum in control to 1205 ± 74.28 nmol/mL serum in model, with an ~61 mol% increase in serum ( Figure 5A ).

Statistical analysis revealed that these differences were highly significant (p<0.005).

The difference of the expected and observed proportion is highly significant (P < 0.005).

2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.005) and adequate to represent the relationship between EPS production.

Immediately after motor learning approach execution there was a highly significant difference in perceived exertion [χ 2 (2) = 10.765, p = 0.005] and mental effort [χ 2 (2) = 9.135, p = 0.01], but not for physical effort [χ 2 (2) = 1.188, p = 0.552].

The difference between the priming conditions in controls was highly significant [ t (11) = 3.4, p = 0.005], consistent with the Reference duration being perceived as approximately 20 ms shorter when preceded by a low-valued prime compared to a high-valued prime.

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a highly significant divergence in event-free survival favoring the SGLT2i group (Log-rank P = 0.005) ( Figure 3 ).

5.56%), the difference in frequencies being statistically highly significant ( p = 0.005).

Further ANOVA analysis ( Table 2 ) performed for all the traits showed highly significant differences in the studied genotypes at P ≤ 0.005.

For both theta and delta measures, post hoc testing showed highly significant differences between Aβ − individuals with intact neurocognitive performance and both of the other groups (all p < 0.005).

129.0±2.8 mmHg, P >0.28), hypertensives demonstrated highly significant increases in systolic blood pressure during wakefulness after sleep (135.0±3.3 mmHg vs. 120.5±3.0 mmHg, P <0.005; interaction group * sleep/wake: F (2,44) = 3.7, P <0.04, Figure 1 ).

Highly significant positive correlations between ASL-ATT and CTP-MTT were obtained by voxel-level-wise associations in the gray matter, white matter, and whole brain (all P < 0.005), and the average Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.787, 0.707, and 0.799, respectively.

Significance was defined as ‘not significant’ (n.s.) with p values > 0.10, as ‘borderline significant’ with p values from 0.10 to 0.05, as ‘significant’ with p values from 0.05 to 0.005 and as ‘highly significant’ with p values < 0.005.

Similarly, comparing RCB class I to III resulted in a highly significant difference with a p-value <0.005.

Although the performance is very similar between the raw Shannon and raw KL scores, the difference is highly significant (p<0.005, binomial test excluding ties).

Performing a multivariate analysis of the Cox proportional hazard regression, where risk of cardiovascular mortality was evaluated, a highly significant increased risk was demonstrated (HR: 9.35; 95 % CI 1.99–43.91; p = 0.005), even in competition with clinical variables influencing cardiac risk (Table 4).

calcaneus or soft tissue were highly significant (p < 0.005).