Excerpts

The correlation between genetic similarity and the taxonomic distance was found highly significant ( r = −0. 50 ; P = 0.005).

Adherence was significantly associated ( P =0.012) with the number of chronic comorbidities in the RA group and was nearly significant in the RA + SLE group ( P =0.005).

Individual regressions of relative gonopodium length on generation were highly significant for all six selection lines (LM: all P <0.005, N =9 generations, R 2 =69.8–89.9%).

The degradation occurred with a delay and was highly significant compared to control ( p < 0.005).

brevis CD2 resulted in a highly significant increase in oral nitrate reduction capacity compared to baseline ( p < 0.005) ( Figure 6 ).

KP also demonstrated a highly significant lateralisation in CSRT ( t = 2.6; p < .005; paired-samples t -test), with leftward CSRT 46 msec slower than rightward.

There were three gene clusters with 5, 12, and 11 genes that were highly significant based on p -values ( p -value ≤ 0.005).

However, there was a strong trend for greater absolute sputum eosinophil count in paucigranulocytic asthmatics versus healthy subjects ( p = 0.005).

The difference in PDs was highly significant ( P < 0.005).

This difference was highly significant (P = 0.005).

The mean movement frequency during Shake and Press showed a highly significant correlation, indicating that the movement frequencies were stable within one hand (Slope: 0.97 ± 0.19, R 2 = 0.71, p < 0.005, Fig. 2B ). 3.2.

The connectograms display highly significant Pearson correlations ( p < 0.005), with p-values corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) method.

A highly significant negative correlation (r=-0.47; P =.005) between velocity in week 1 (MW_VEL1) and path length during the first trial block was observed in mGlu4 -/- mice.

The TD was found to exhibit a highly significant impact on OS, which was 4.3 months (3.7-5 months) versus 18.2 months (8.5–28.7 months) for patients with a TD below 205 Gy or over 205 Gy, respectively ( p = 0.005).

Difference between the initial and the final sizes of the lesion was also statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.005).

The linear regression model reveals a negative trend between the rating of the local health care waiting time and the choice to travel for care, operationalized as the odds of traveling [ F (1,3) = 68.45, p < 0.005] with an adjusted R 2 of 0.94.

Highly significant GO terms ( P <0.005) associated with the subset of genes that were upregulated at 4 μM heme were ‘embryonic development’, ‘lipid transport’, and ‘proteolysis’ ( Figure 4C ; Table S6 ); ‘responses to stress’ and environmental stimuli' were associated with genes that were downregulated at 4 μM heme ( Figure S2 and Tables S7 , S8 , S9 ).

The comparison of mean values of parameters measured between male and female showed highly significant differences of P < 0.005.

There was a highly significant difference in the cumulative volume of HO between both groups with decreased HO volume in the treatment group compared to the control group ( p = 0.005, Fig. 4 ).

When evaluating the individual average contributions over all periods across PCC and FR, we find that there is a highly significant difference across these two treatments (Non-parametric Mann Whitney test, z = -2.791, p = 0.005).

Correlation between BPF and clinical measures revealed moderately significant positive correlation ( r = 0.287, P = 0.005) between BPF and disease duration.

More specifically, when different noise conditions are tested separately, only the 1D condition approaches statistical significance (two-tailed paired WSR test for measured versus predicted estimates returns p < 0.005 but this value does not survive Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison; the remaining three noise conditions return p>0.05 whether corrected or not).

Data Analysis Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the rates of mutation for each gene between the two genders with a p-value of <0.05 considered indicative of a positive trend and a p-value of <0.005 considered statistically significantly due to Bonferroni correction.

The VAS score revealed a statistically highly significant difference between the Test group and Control group (p ≤ 0.005) ( Table 3 ).

The results of the performed regression analyses display the existence of a statistically significant, and a marginally non-significant association of the reported SEF prevalence with dominance ( p = 0.005), and type of data ( p = 0.060), respectively (Table 3 ).